The Issue of Issue, Deers, and ART
A couple of days ago, I read an article on alternative reproductive technology, “ART,” and posthumously born children. It reminded me of conversations and cases about heirs that I’d also recently encountered. The article, conversations, and readings affirmed for me that the question of who is an “heir” or “issue,” while initially may seem simple to answer, can be complex. Thirty years ago, the definition of “child” found in a will or trust may have been a few sentences. Today, that definition is – or should be – a few paragraphs. Consider the following: Jeremy and Jessica were in a loving, committed, cohabiting relationship for more than 10 years and were unmarried because they refused to institutionalize their relationship. Still they wanted to have a baby, but Jay was sterile. However, Jeremy’s best friend, Keith, agreed to b a sperm donor. Eventually, they found a clinic that would perform the procedure and Keith was asked to sign a consent form. One statement on the form provided that Keith waived all rights of parentage with respect to the child that would be born to Jeremy and Jessica using Keith’s sperm. He was to check that box if he agreed with this statement. Keith thought about his significant other, Karen. He and Karen were also in a long-term relationship and discussed marriage and children a few months ago. But no definitive plans were made. Keith was in his early 40s and very successful; if he and Karen didn’t work out, he reasoned that this could be his only chance at quasi-parenthood. He decided not to check the box and think about it more but he signed the form. Jessica underwent the procedure the day Keith signed the form. Then, the 3 left the clinic; Keith headed home to Karen. Unfortunately Keith never arrived home. He was killed when a deer darted out in front of his car and Keith swerved onto a patch of ice, careening him and his car into an oncoming semi-tractor trailer. Karen was more than distraught because she was going to tell Keith about the bundle of joy that was produced when she and Keith had far too much to drink a couple of months ago. Keith died without a will, so who will eventually inherit his estate? Illinois law provides that posthumously born children are children of the decedent. Consequently, if both ladies were successful giving birth, then both children would have been Keith\’s heirs. This also illustrates the importance of another provision now becoming a standard in wills and trusts – the genetic reproductive material provision. If Jessica chose to store Keith’s sperm until a day she was more fertile and Keith died before that day with a will that had a genetic reproductive material provision, then Jessica could have been precluded from using his sperm. Keith could have also changed the definition of children in his will to expressly disinherit any children born of ART except those born during the time he is in an intimate, cohabiting relationship with the mother of said child. Still, all this presupposes that Keith would not have wanted 2 daughters. The point? No one can predict who or what our family will be or look like, but when we make a decision about what part or all of that family may look like, we need to write it down in a legal instrument ASAP.
Lottery Lessons for Murderers
Recently, an Illinois man won a million dollars playing the Illinois Lottery. In an unfortunate turn of events, shortly after taking his smiling photo op with check in hand and stating his intentions, he died. Initially, it was thought he died of bad eating habits leading to clogged arteries and a bad heart. However, something seemed a little fishy, so the authorities were called in to request an autopsy and investigate. Ya think? One need not be a lawyer to know who was first on the list of suspects: immediate family. Not only is this is going to make an interesting whodunit but it also gave yours truly the answer to “what to write about this week?” Answer: Crime doesn’t pay even if the “payor” died without a will. Let\’s look at an example: Jennifer inherits $1 million from her father and announces to family that she is going to place the money in trust for her children. Her only living relatives are her spouse, Jeremy, and their 2 sons, Bill and Ted. Jennifer then drowns while swimming but before establishing the trust and she didn’t have a will. Later, authorities arrest a close family member and charge that person with murder. It seems that the family member didn’t agree with Jennifer’s plans. So what will happen to the cool million? It depends. Usually, in Illinois, if a spouse with a child or dependent dies intestate (with no will or trust in place), then the surviving spouse and the child will share equally in the decedent’s estate…unless one of the heirs caused the decedent’s death. If the heir intentionally and unjustifiably caused the decedent’s death, then he or she will not “receive any property, benefit, or other interest by reason of the death.” Illinois Probate Act of 1975, 755 ILCS 5/2-6. Instead the benefit will go to the heir next in line. Also, the form of that benefit or interest is irrelevant; it could be retirement proceeds, which are nontestamentary. Furthermore, the denial of the inheritance need not be made in criminal court but can be made by any competent jurisdiction. However, a few hurdles still exist: The criminal proceeding must end with a final judgment of guilty … unless the criminal trial doesn’t occur for more than a year after the death. The 401(k) administrator, for example, could have released the funds to the murdering heir without knowing the heir was the one who really retired the retiree. Accordingly, the plan administrator won’t be held liable. Still, the court would likely make the defendant give the money to the heir next in line … unless, of course, the murder is a successful fugitive and not a defendant. So what would be the results for our example: If Jeremy murdered Jennifer, then the money would go to Bill and Ted as intended. If Bill was the murderer, then the money would go to Jeremy and Ted to share equally. If Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, then Jeremy gets it all. If Jeremy, Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, that would be a little odd given that Bill and Ted were going to get it all, but hey… In that case, if there were no heirs, then Illinois won the Lottery. Lesson: If you win the lottery and you have to take a photo and someone asks about your plans, tell them to contact your attorney.
3 New Year\’s Resolutions & the Great Cliff Compromise
On December 31, 2012 the United States Senate passed what I like to refer to as the “Great Cliff Compromise” and sent the bill to the House for its blessing. Knowing the House as being one of the most unpredictable entities within the U.S. government, speculation abounded as to whether the blessing would come or whether the bill would be cursed upon and sent back or rewritten in which case the Senate would curse it. However, for reasons that will likely remain with Representative House Leader Boehner and is compatriots, on January 1, 2013, the House voted for the Great Cliff Compromise. Now, many lawmakers, policy wonks, and concerned citizens don’t consider this so “great” or a “compromise.” They aren\’t seeing fireworks of the pretty, sparkly, ooo-ahhh, kind. Instead, they have visions of gray skies and storms in their heads. The disdain lies with the fact that spending cuts were not addressed, and neither was the debt ceiling. And it is the issue of spending cuts that causes as much, if not more, contention between Democrats and Republicans than increased taxes on the affluent. I’d love to see a poll on that one without “both” and “neither” being offered as a choice. Sorry, I digress… So the brow-furrowing continues because over the cliff we went, landed without too many bumps or bruises, but with another nosedive staring America in the face in two months. Still, the Shark Free Zone is most concerned, at least for now, with that part of the parachute involving estate planning. While both Congressional chambers have a lot of work to do to prevent the nosedive, the uncertainty surrounding the federal lifetime estate tax exemption is primarily gone. Some pieces about annual gifting and GSTT indexing must be ironed out but according to esteemed colleagues, they are “being worked on.” Therefore, the lifetime federal estate tax exemption remains at $5 million and indexed for inflation and the marginal rate of the excess of $5 million increased from 35% to 40%. If you were worried because you didn’t have a chance to gift your gazillion dollars away in 2012, you may have time… If you were concerned that you gave a bazillion dollars away but that, upon your death, your loved ones would still have to give more than half to Uncle Sam in taxes, you can relax, probably… BUT, if you’ve not done anything, such as downloaded a power of attorney and had it signed and notarized; confirmed life insurance designations weren’t minor children; or talked with family…even the most harmonious of U.S. Congresses won’t be able to help your loved ones. Not comparing myself to the likes of Biden or McConnell by any stretch of the imagination, may I suggest a few New Year’s Resolutions? Revisit your existing plan; or Create your plan; or Talk to your family about wanting a plan. You have at least 363 days to go…or until the next bipartisan Congressional vote decides to repeal the law and lower the tax rate…
3-Cubed Lessons for Families & Lawyers who Serve Them
As the year draws to a close, reflection is a natural activity. So, below are reflections about relationships that are key to “family work,” whether you’re working on yours or working for someone else’s. Reconnecting. Most of us have various “families,” including the one into which we were borne. High school or college classmates who take the journey with us from late childhood into early adulthood is one example. Coworkers who eventually become close friends is another. Neighbors who share the block on which we raise our children and wave to the mail carrier is yet another. Therefore, staying connected or reconnecting with our several families provides us with multiple layers of protection, comfort, and enjoyment. Relationships – good and bad – take time. Even in a most loving family, a newborn crying, pooping, and sleeping takes adjusting to. We all have unique cycles that require a little getting used to. The question is, however, how soon can we identify relationships that aren’t beneficial so that the extraction is less difficult. Logically, identifying this point sooner rather than later is key or else we may end up paying attorneys a great deal of money to unravel a ball of thorns that could have been prevented. Women matter. We work just as hard as men, if not harder. But we’re paid less and that monetary standard reflects our diminished value in the eyes of our employers. That diminished value is based on the fact that we bring and nurture life – eventually more employees – and must take time off to do so. Continual and de facto ignoring women\’s value will cost employers, advisors, and society dearly. So it behooves all of us to recognize the true worth of our mothers, daughters, wives, partners, and sisters. Team estrogen is moving forward, making powerful decisions about family, community, and nation. Forced networking sucks. Understanding someone’s value system, work ethics, and motivation takes more than the 30-minute coffee klatch. I value my friends, family members, and colleagues so I don’t want to waste their time and the time of others with referrals who are a bad fit. Consequently, even if you’re just a referral source, that doesn’t change the fact that the first rule of networking is grounded in Lesson #2. Generations are unique. Matriarchs, patriarchs, other leaders, and managers should recognize that each generation has its own set of rules. Passing on the family fortune with a heavily detailed blueprint created by Great-Grandfather Algernone will probably not bode well for the fortune or the family. Algernone\’s framework may work with regular retrofitting, but the details must be fleshed out using the world as it exists in the eyes of the current generation and possibly next generation. If not, just leave the family fortune to the family pooch. Reach back. At the first glimpse of success, take the hand of a junior and bring him or her along. Make the time and take the time. Even if you didn’t see it; somebody had a hand in making your bootstraps. Thank you. Sincerely articulated, that 2-word sentence carries more gravitas than Olympic weight-lifters. Causes are everywhere – for a reason. Millions need food, shelter, clothing, books, medicine, water, and peace. Causes are everywhere – for a reason. Marriage doesn’t make the family, authentic relationships do. “She has hers; I have mine; what we build during our relationship will be ours.” This is a favorite mantra among divorce attorneys and it wreaks havoc for estate planners later when intent changes but the walls were never torn down. We must be mindful that where there are people and relationships there is overlap and trying to build one wall may undermine what could have been a solid and lasting foundation.
3 Ways A Will Is Not Cake (de Gateaux)
One primary reason many individuals in Illinois use a revocable living trust is to avoid the court process known as probate. Why do people want to avoid probate here? Well, probate is: Time consuming, requiring at least 7 months, typically 13 – 14 months, and sometimes longer to complete; Costly, at least $2,500 if there is no litigation, i.e., a claim made against the estate; and Public and so anyone in the public domain can view for himself or herself what a cheapskate the testator was or who got disinherited. However, even if your beneficiaries can wait a year, no claims will be lodged, $2500 is un morceau de gateaux, and no one gets disinherited, a few additional reasons make trusts more attractive than wills, especially with respect to gifting: You want to ensure your children or grandchildren have an opportunity to attend all 4 years of college and a good graduate program without financial aid angst. Trusts provisions known as “staggered mentoring” provisions and a separate educational subtrust help in this situation. If you and your spouse want to leave the family residence to your children, but you still want to maintain control of the residence during your lifetime, a QPRT (“qualified personal residence trust”) may do the trick. If you live in a state that does not match the federal estate tax regime, such as Illinois, and you want to leave more to the children by minimizing the amount of estate taxes your beneficiaries will have to pay both Uncles – Sam and Quinn, instead of the normal two-pot trust, a three-pot trust may work. As with most estate planning vehicles, trusts also have disadvantages in gifting, such as trust fees and administrative costs if the estate is very large. Additionally, unless the gift is given completely away, or you opt for an asset protection trust, it will be more difficult to use federal and state lifetime estate tax exemptions. Still, the advantages of having a trust, for many Illinois families, outweigh the disadvantages irrespective of the income bracket because every family is unique and minimizing taxes isn’t the only type of protection afforded by trusts. Disclaimer Woman Caveat: The materials provided in this blog, The Shark Free Zone, and throughout the website for The Law Offices of Max Elliott, Ltd. are for educational purposes only. By reading these materials, no attorney client relationship has been established. Additionally, because of the very complex nature of estate planning, one should not attempt to create or draft a trust on your own but seek the counsel of an estate planner. Finally, IRS Circular 230 Notice: \”To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.\”
Preventing Family Feuds for the Smallbiz Owner
At a Chicago Bar Association’s Solo/Small Firm Committee Meeting, I gave remarks on why estate planning is not a “basic” endeavor. A favorite example was a about Ms. Small Biz (Ms. SMB) who was married to Mr. Manager and had College-Age Children. It’s a favorite example because it identifies the issues contemporary families comprised of smallbiz owners may confront with respect to business planning, disability, death, and succession planning: Ms. SMB is the sole proprietor of a small, lucrative, and growing graphic design firm. She has 3 employees in addition to herself, and her son works part time during the school-year and full-time during the summer. Her daughter, however, has no interest in the business. But Ms. SMB has great vision for the business with a Pinterest page, a blog, and even a design auction website. Her husband is satisfied with his position as a midlevel manager with a software company. So the family is happy and enjoying its status. For several years now, Ms. SMB has been consistently reaping the fruits of 10 years of hard work and wants to ensure that in the event of her disability or death, her family and business are safe and wrapped up in a neat little package. So how should the estate planning attorney assist? First, we should assess the following: her stand-alone net worth; when the last time, if ever, was her business valued; what is the best legal entity for her business (at this point it should not be a sole proprietorship); who will run the business – digital assets and all – if she suffers a long-term illness; upon her death does she want the business sold or transferred to her son or her son and employees, or family and employees; who will wind the business up if she wants it sold; and if it is sold who gets what and in what form? Undoubtedly, Ms. SMB will need a will or a trust. She will also need to consider the tax implications of the business entity, e.g., LLC, S-Corp, FLP, she decides on. And what about those digital assets; do we need to consult with an IP colleague? However, what is equally important is her decision about what to do with the business at her death. This decision will weigh heavily on her attorney’s counsel about choosing fiduciaries. For example, will that person understand her business, can he or she successfully execute a buy/sell agreement, and can he or she manage winding up the business? Additionally, she wants to provide for both children equally. But giving half of the business’ financial interests to the daughter when the daughter has shown no interest may start a family feud between the siblings. Perhaps life insurance may help and may help in two ways. Once, the attorney ascertains the value of her business and, subsequently, her estate, life insurance can help lower the value of the estate for estate tax purposes and equalize the gifting between her two children. This example shows that smallbiz owners have a several critical decisions and options to make and consider at the start and near the end of their involvement with their businesses. Also, because the decisions made in the beginning can significantly affect the options with respect to succession planning, new smallbiz owners should seek to create a business plan that isn’t a stand-alone plan, but one that also encompasses estate planning. Ms. or Mr. Smallbiz & Family is just one of the faces of today’s family and the multiple faces and overlaps of today’s family shows why estate planning isn’t a “basic” area.
Don\’t Let JT Defeat Your Purpose
A piece I wrote a little while ago described the 3 tenancies of property ownership: Tenants in Common, Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship, and Tenancy by the Entirety. Occasionally, individuals of modest means will ask me about adding a non-spouse family member as a joint tenant to a bank account or to the title of their home. Typically, the individual is elderly, recognizing his or her mortality, or failing health. I applaud their queries because ensuring your financial affairs and making sure that funds are available to address illness or incapacity are in order as the golden years approach is critical. Yet, I caution against using joint tenancy with non-spouses* for the following reasons: Creditors. While the original owner’s credit may be stellar, the son, daughter, or niece may have outstanding debts. Joint tenancy allows creditors to attach liens to the property, thus defeating the purpose of having one’s financial affairs in order or being able to at least financially provide for one’s self in the event of illness or infirmity. Potential Probate. Just because property is in joint tenancy, at least in Illinois, doesn’t mean that probate is automatically avoided. If a gift wasn’t the rationale but a matter of convenience, as mentioned above was the premise and a will is in place, then per Illinois law, the property could have to pass through probate. Taxes. Unless the joint tenancy is between spouses, estate gift taxes may be triggered. Upon one tenant’s death, the estate tax is determined by the amount of contribution by the surviving tenant. If the surviving non-spouse tenant didn’t contribute to paying for the property, then the entire amount of the property is included in the decedent’s gross estate for estate tax purposes. So, we should think again about entering into joint tenancy agreements with non-spouse members, especially if any of the 3 reasons above may loom overhead. *If the surviving tenant is a spouse, then only half of the value of the property is included in the deceased spouse’s estate, reducing potential estate taxes by 50%.
Windsor: An Update on the Same-Sex Marriage March
I wrote about this case in the \”Love & the Law\” series. It has huge estate planning implications for the LGBT community and recently, the Obama Administration has recommended it instead of other same-sex marriage cases that the U.S. Supreme Court is deciding whether to hear. Factual synopsis: When Thea died, the federal government refused to recognize her marriage to Edie (they were legally married in Toronto, Canada) and taxed Edie\’s inheritance from Thea as though they were strangers. Under federal tax law, a spouse who dies can leave her assets, including the family home, to the other spouse without incurring estate taxes. Traditionally, whether a couple is married for federal purposes depends on whether they are considered married in their state. New York recognized Edie and Thea\’s marriage, but because of a federal law called the \”Defense of Marriage Act,\” or DOMA, the federal government refuses to treat married same-sex couples, like Edie and Thea, the same way as other married couples. Edie challenged the constitutionality of DOMA and sought a refund of the estate tax she was unfairly forced to pay. The Southern District Court of New York (“SDNY”) agreed with Edie and granted summary judgment, stating that it could find no rational basis for Section 3 of DOMA and therefore, Section 3 violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (“BLAG”), hired by the House of Representatives to defend the government, appealed to the Second Circuit setting forth 3 basic legal arguments and additional non-legal arguments. The legal arguments were as follows: Federal estate tax law provides that the state of domicile determines marital status and because at the time of Thea’s death, New York didn’t perform same-sex marriages, the lower court’s decision should be overturned. The Second Circuit stated that it could predict that New York would have recognized the marriage at the time of Thea’s death, so that argument was defeated. Congress can prohibit same-sex marriages like states can per Baker v. Nelson. The Second Circuit reminded BLAG that state regulation and federal regulation are different. So Baker wasn’t applicable in this case. Section 3 of DOMA should be analyzed using the rational basis or “rational basis plus.” The Second Circuit stated there is no such thing as \”rational basis plus\” yet and set out a four-prong test for heightened scrutiny per Bowen v. Gilliard and City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center and established that the LGBT community passed this test and should be considered a quasi-suspect class. After reviewing the non-legal arguments to provide rhetorical dicta, the Second Circuit affirmed SDNY’s decision, holding that “Section 3 of DOMA violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional.” The thorny part of this case is that the Second Circuit’s decision reads like a roadmap for the Supreme Court to punt the cases on DOMA back to the states. However, the argument against the proposition that state and federal regulations are different and, therefore, this should be an issue left for the states to decide, is that many regulations may be different but many state and federal regulations also overlap, if not in substance, in application. Hence, parsing the overlap of the rules and regulations that DOMA implicates may be more burdensome with respect to costs for both the states and the federal government than simply ruling that DOMA is unconstitutional.
Be Sure to Consider the Coin\’s Third Side
I wrote this piece before “the election” after reading an article on the “what if” of an election tie. Each party’s camp, of course, believed their candidate was going to win with a considerable margin. Yet, each party’s camp also had a team of lawyers already prepared for the “what if” of a tie. The article reminded me of a lesson I learned long ago from a very wise woman. And that lesson is that every coin has 3 sides, not 2 but 3. Moreover, irrespective of how unlikely it may be that the coin will land on its third side, that likelihood should never be ignored. The lesson of the third side is one I share with not just clients but everyone I can. However, let’s talk about estate planning for a minute. Of course, there’s no “what if” about death; we’re all going to die one day whether we want to or not, but estate planning is about much more than death. Consider the phrase, “estate planning”: Legally speaking your “estate” is everything you own. “Planning” is self-explanatory. So, estate planning is about planning for what you own. If you have loved ones, this plan naturally includes determining how those assets will be distributed to your loved ones during your lifetime and upon your death. The lesson of the third side is also about the “what ifs” of estate planning: Today, you’re a young couple with an infant and nothing but life insurance and what if…you win the lottery? Your parents left you with a substantial inheritance, which could have adverse tax implications for you, what if…there was a way you could roll it over? Your health is fine, your kids are adults and financially stable, your estate is sufficient to see you through retirement and what if…you don\’t own a home? You want to start taking a lot more time away from your small business, which you’ve successfully established and maintained over the last 15 years, what if…you\’ve been the sole proprietor all those years? This year, you’re taking advantage of the homestead exemption for your residence but you’re approaching retirement , want to give the house to your children, what if…you still need a place to stay? Like millions of others, you’re now behind retirement planning because Enron, the subprime mortgage, and the boyz on Wall Street took a chunk out of your 401(k), and what if…your partner becomes seriously ill? Today the federal estate tax exemption is $5.12 million; if Congress does nothing by December 31, 2012, what if …on November 30, you had sold your business for $8 million? Gran always said the third side is the least best or worst expected outcome. Consider the coin’s third side as you plan and you’ve planned just about as well as you can.
5 Smallbiz Takeaways from Torrents and Blizzards
In the wake of Superstorm Sandy was nearly unfathomable destruction of lives and businesses. However, the American spirit is resilient and, together, we\’re recovering. It is simply taking time. During disasters of that magnitude, we often chide ourselves for not being prepared or as prepared as we could have been because much more needs to be done long before the insurance check arrives. As an attorney and smallbiz owner who assists clients with preparing legacies and for potentially unpleasant events, the need to prepare for disasters isn’t lost on me. Smallbiz owners and their families who depend on the businesses\’ earnings are particularly vulnerable, so it\’s critical that we have a continuity plan for emergencies. Like the preparations outlined in a business plan that consider key operations and resources, so should your continuity plan. Below, are a few questions smalbiz owners should consider when devising a disaster recovery plan. Caveat: This list is by no means exhaustive, comprehensive, or tailored to any particular business. It just serves to help us prepare for the next storm. What would an all out disaster look like for your business? Consider the elements – wind, fire, earth, water – and how extreme amounts of any would impact your business operations, e.g., causing network outages, inventory destruction, and so forth. What are the procedures that would put your business back on track and, specifically, who will be responsible for what and when and how will they perform the necessary tasks?a. Who will lead the team or how will tasks be divided?b. Who will contact clients and vendors, and how? What if cell towers are down?c. Is the disaster just affecting your business or is it also affecting clients?d. What if the disaster occurs “after hours”?e. How will you assess the overall impact to your go forward? Which business resources or operations are likely to suffer more, e.g., are you a restaurant owner with no electricity but with a refrigerator and a freezer full of food? Are your clients local but your employees commute from long distances? Where are your critical client or customer files stored? What if you can’t access the building or your company’s network? Where exactly is your \”cloud?\” Can you temporarily relocate your business, where and do you have sufficient resources to do that? Indeed, this is a “short list” to help small business owners think about a particularly unpleasant topic. Yet, we smallbiz owners know that asking the important “what ifs?” often saves a bundle down the line, despite the torrential downpours, tumult in the streets, blazes, or blizzards. The Law Offices of Max Elliott continues extending its thoughts and prayers to families and businesses who experience disaster as winds of change forever sweep our world.