3 Lessons about Grapes and Taxes
As Baby Boomers start retiring, thoughts of mortality and legacy planning begin to dance in their heads. While most boomers don’t have taxable estates…for now…the future is still a question mark for many. While enjoying retirement – golf course, cruises, mountain climbing, museum walks, wine tasting, and theatre galas – plans should be made for a time when the retirement funds must be transferred to someone else. It is critical to know how to transfer retirement proceeds properly so the distributions won\’t be literally and figuratively taxing: Claire and Cliff are in their mid 60’s. They’ve a modest estate – home valued at about $250K with most of its equity remaining, life insurance, and retirement benefits at about $2 million. Half of the retirement proceeds is in a 401(k), 25% is in an IRA, and 25% is in an annuity. They also have 2 kids: Lenny and Lisa. Lisa’s a starving artist, who is barely in the 15% tax bracket but who also has a vivacious and smart teenager. Lenny is 10 years older than Lisa and a savvy professional about to move into the highest tax bracket and has no intention of marrying or ever having children. Claire and Cliff want to distribute their estate to Lisa and Lenny equally and have been told to give the retirement proceeds to Lenny and Lisa outright. Before doing that, however, I would ask them to consider the following in a simultaneous death situation, where Claire and Cliff went down with the Titanic III: An outright gift from a 401(k) or a traditional IRA will be taxed and if the beneficiary is over 59 ½, the 10% penalty may also apply. For Lenny, who’s Mr. Money Bags, that doesn’t present too much of a problem, though no one wants to pay taxes. For Lisa, that would be a boon indeed. But an outright distribution to Lisa would yield less than what she would receive were the proceeds titled to a trust because of income tax consequences. Pick the fruit too young and the wine will be bitter; too old and you may taste too much oak. Claire and Cliff could have the proceeds placed in a trust for Lenny and Lisa. Here, part of Lisa’s benefit would be driven by Lenny’s life expectancy because he is the oldest, which would provide her with fewer years of income. Additionally, Lenny and Lisa must be sure to withdraw at least as much as the minimum required distribution annually or face a hefty penalty. Different varietals require different soils. In a qualified (retirement) annuity, the entire amount of the contract must be withdrawn over the 5-year period following Claire and Cliff’s death. Again, okay for Lenny, but not so okay for Lisa. Tax consequences also apply to this issue. Cabernets are as good as zinfandels; it\’s the consumer\’s tolerance that is key. Just like no 2 families are alike, no 2 children are alike. So make sure that your children know how to make decisions about the different types of distributions they can choose, after you enjoy your fruits. That way, the remaining fruit will, in fact, go to your children and not the community jelly jar.
Lottery Lessons for Murderers
Recently, an Illinois man won a million dollars playing the Illinois Lottery. In an unfortunate turn of events, shortly after taking his smiling photo op with check in hand and stating his intentions, he died. Initially, it was thought he died of bad eating habits leading to clogged arteries and a bad heart. However, something seemed a little fishy, so the authorities were called in to request an autopsy and investigate. Ya think? One need not be a lawyer to know who was first on the list of suspects: immediate family. Not only is this is going to make an interesting whodunit but it also gave yours truly the answer to “what to write about this week?” Answer: Crime doesn’t pay even if the “payor” died without a will. Let\’s look at an example: Jennifer inherits $1 million from her father and announces to family that she is going to place the money in trust for her children. Her only living relatives are her spouse, Jeremy, and their 2 sons, Bill and Ted. Jennifer then drowns while swimming but before establishing the trust and she didn’t have a will. Later, authorities arrest a close family member and charge that person with murder. It seems that the family member didn’t agree with Jennifer’s plans. So what will happen to the cool million? It depends. Usually, in Illinois, if a spouse with a child or dependent dies intestate (with no will or trust in place), then the surviving spouse and the child will share equally in the decedent’s estate…unless one of the heirs caused the decedent’s death. If the heir intentionally and unjustifiably caused the decedent’s death, then he or she will not “receive any property, benefit, or other interest by reason of the death.” Illinois Probate Act of 1975, 755 ILCS 5/2-6. Instead the benefit will go to the heir next in line. Also, the form of that benefit or interest is irrelevant; it could be retirement proceeds, which are nontestamentary. Furthermore, the denial of the inheritance need not be made in criminal court but can be made by any competent jurisdiction. However, a few hurdles still exist: The criminal proceeding must end with a final judgment of guilty … unless the criminal trial doesn’t occur for more than a year after the death. The 401(k) administrator, for example, could have released the funds to the murdering heir without knowing the heir was the one who really retired the retiree. Accordingly, the plan administrator won’t be held liable. Still, the court would likely make the defendant give the money to the heir next in line … unless, of course, the murder is a successful fugitive and not a defendant. So what would be the results for our example: If Jeremy murdered Jennifer, then the money would go to Bill and Ted as intended. If Bill was the murderer, then the money would go to Jeremy and Ted to share equally. If Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, then Jeremy gets it all. If Jeremy, Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, that would be a little odd given that Bill and Ted were going to get it all, but hey… In that case, if there were no heirs, then Illinois won the Lottery. Lesson: If you win the lottery and you have to take a photo and someone asks about your plans, tell them to contact your attorney.
Be Sure to Consider the Coin\’s Third Side
I wrote this piece before “the election” after reading an article on the “what if” of an election tie. Each party’s camp, of course, believed their candidate was going to win with a considerable margin. Yet, each party’s camp also had a team of lawyers already prepared for the “what if” of a tie. The article reminded me of a lesson I learned long ago from a very wise woman. And that lesson is that every coin has 3 sides, not 2 but 3. Moreover, irrespective of how unlikely it may be that the coin will land on its third side, that likelihood should never be ignored. The lesson of the third side is one I share with not just clients but everyone I can. However, let’s talk about estate planning for a minute. Of course, there’s no “what if” about death; we’re all going to die one day whether we want to or not, but estate planning is about much more than death. Consider the phrase, “estate planning”: Legally speaking your “estate” is everything you own. “Planning” is self-explanatory. So, estate planning is about planning for what you own. If you have loved ones, this plan naturally includes determining how those assets will be distributed to your loved ones during your lifetime and upon your death. The lesson of the third side is also about the “what ifs” of estate planning: Today, you’re a young couple with an infant and nothing but life insurance and what if…you win the lottery? Your parents left you with a substantial inheritance, which could have adverse tax implications for you, what if…there was a way you could roll it over? Your health is fine, your kids are adults and financially stable, your estate is sufficient to see you through retirement and what if…you don\’t own a home? You want to start taking a lot more time away from your small business, which you’ve successfully established and maintained over the last 15 years, what if…you\’ve been the sole proprietor all those years? This year, you’re taking advantage of the homestead exemption for your residence but you’re approaching retirement , want to give the house to your children, what if…you still need a place to stay? Like millions of others, you’re now behind retirement planning because Enron, the subprime mortgage, and the boyz on Wall Street took a chunk out of your 401(k), and what if…your partner becomes seriously ill? Today the federal estate tax exemption is $5.12 million; if Congress does nothing by December 31, 2012, what if …on November 30, you had sold your business for $8 million? Gran always said the third side is the least best or worst expected outcome. Consider the coin’s third side as you plan and you’ve planned just about as well as you can.
7 Money-Savers before Googling, Binging, or Yahoo!ing \’Wills\’
This sucks as a topic sentence but the truth isn’t always tasty, so here goes: Contemplating death is not something most folks like to think about. Yet, if you want your transition to be as smooth as possible for your loved ones, recognizing the emotional turmoil they will undoubtedly be experiencing, having your affairs in order is a loving and thoughtful way that can prevent further turmoil. However, before you Google “wills,” take the time to consider what you want for your family in the event of an unexpected tragedy or the inevitable. Taking sufficient time to thoughtfully deliberate about your intentions before you meet with an attorney will also save you money on attorneys’ fees, and who doesn’t want to save money these days? Your considerations should probably start with your loved ones: If you have minor children or dependents, then they will need a guardian. If you have a pet or pets, then you should consider who would be best and willing to care for your cockatoo or kitty. If you own a home, then who should pay the mortgage? Are the beneficiary designations on your retirement accounts accurate? What should happen if 1 of your 2 children becomes disabled? Should the distributions still be absolutely equal? What type of gift should you consider for your niece or best friend’s daughter who’s also like a daughter to you but you have 2 other children? Who gets your favorite blue sweater? Many questions that we need to have answers for to get our affairs properly situated, don’t involve money. Still, the sooner we can answer, “What if?” and “Who?” the sooner we can create a sustainable peace of mind over both our financial and personal affairs.
Straight Couples & Civil Unions: Cutting Off Your Nose Off to Spite Your Face?
On March 29, 2012, I was given the honor to speak at the Black Women Lawyers’ Association of Greater Chicago (BWLA) CLE program on LGBT Employment and Relationship Rights Discrimination. My commentary addressed the challenges DOMA creates for members of the LGBT community and those providing them with needed services. If you\’re unfamiliar with the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, the statute’s language states that “the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is husband or wife.” DOMA also states that this definition of marriage is the legally recognized definition for any federal or congressional law, “ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States.” Accordingly, if a federal law or regulation concerns married persons, the definition of ‘marriage’ used to determine the applicability of the law or regulation will be DOMA’s definition, despite what state law says. DOMA is the first time since Loving v. Virginia that a branch of our government defined what a marriage can look like, and, although the court in Loving got it right, Congress and President Clinton with DOMA got it wrong. Consequently, because of DOMA, gay or lesbian couples cannot take advantage of the more than 1,000 benefits afforded straight married couples by the federal government, even if the couple resides in a state that recognizes same-sex marriages. This unfair result is the basis of current court challenges: Gill v. OPM, Windsor v. U.S., and Golinski v. OPM. Each case involves the denial of federal benefits, such as retirement, social security, and estate tax refunds, to LGBT couples. Consequently, it should be easy to see how this discriminatory law has caused significant and unnecessary implications for American citizens and the estate planning community. One BWLA program attendee asked if straight couples could benefit from the Illinois Civil Union Act that affords LGBT Civil Union partners all the obligations, benefits, responsibilities, and protections of Illinois married couples. Ironically, a recent article in the Illinois Bar Journal espoused the benefits straight couples could glean from entering into a Civil Union instead of getting married. My colleague used the Alternative Minimum Tax calculation to support her argument, dismissing the marital deduction and portability “issues” because these techniques are applicable to the very wealthy and impliedly are outliers. This is a reasonable argument for lower-income families; however, repeating the response I gave at the program, suggesting heterosexual couples enter into Civil Unions is questionable guidance because of the more than 1,000 federal benefits attached to marriage. Thus, if a heterosexual couple is considering a Civil Union and is not approaching or is not in retirement, a careful balancing of income tax liabilities and other assets and future income should probably be performed before considering a Civil Union. What may be gained in an income tax refund may be lost several times over in employee, health, and other benefits.
Saving Parents\’ Precious Resources
Occasionally, I’m stunned by how little current clients\’ or customers\’ needs are considered by service providers. As an estate planning attorney for “non-traditional families,” one of my key concerns for my clients is providing them with services that are not only excellent, but also efficient. Nontraditional families include women who are heads of households with children and, as the primary wage earner, they have 3 issues to continually manage: Financial resources Time Parenting While The Law Offices of Max Elliott may not be able to assist in quality parenting, we do provide services and use tools that bring efficiency to the first 2 issues. In plain English, we help our clients by saving them money and time. Estate planning, as is said so often now, is not just for the very wealthy. So our services allow you to determine the scope of estate planning protection that fits within your financial framework. Are you a median wage earner who rents with a teenager living at home but working his or her way through college? If so, then an estate plan that encompasses education planning and a Qualified Personal Residence Trust, or “QPRT,” may be unnecessary AND we won’t turn you away. We will simply recognize that more than likely, to protect your family and yourself, you will and should want to start with simpler vehicles, which is what you can obtain for probably less than 1-2 months’ rent. BUT… “It’s not money, but time,” you say. Well let’s look at Joan: Joan is an HR executive at a Fortune 500 company and earns more than the median. Plus, she’s up by 5 AM to workout, get the kids off to school and daycare, is working her smartphone by 7:30 at the office by train by 9ish, eats lunch at her desk, is on the 5:15 and cooking or ordering in by 6:30 but answers her email until 10:00 PM. Weekends are for catching up on the latest SHRM reports she missed while taking the train during the week. Joan came up along the ranks in HR, so it would be unwise for us to waste her time talking about 401(k) planning and HSAs. She’s a tech wizard who lives in the ‘burbs and works downtown, so I’d also never think to ask her to commit to only in-person meetings when a teleconference or an exchange on our secure client directory will suffice. Speaking of that directory, if you are the mom, renting, and with the teenager or a parent with kids and no time like Joan, or someone who just wants to save time and money, our secure online portal that is available for clients makes it easy to engage in substantive, secure conversations, exchange documents, and pay fees all in one place. It’s not an open e-mail or even e-mail on our website. It’s a secure, designed specifically for lawyers and used strictly by us and our clients. So, in concluding this shameless “use our service” self-promotional piece, I’ll just say that whoever you choose as your legal services team, make sure that your precious resources are considered and used wisely.
Team Estrogen Needs to Plan Now for Now … and Then
For my male readers, I’m shouting one out for the estrogen team, today. You\’re more than welcomed to stay and share this post with the hub of your life, but I’ll return to the neutral zone with the next post. Recently, I shared a number of articles via Twitter and LinkedIn about the supposed trepidation women have when it comes to estate planning, particularly managing their financial affairs. As a female lawyer in a practice area traditionally held by men, I must admit those articles ruffled my feathers. I contend that women are not afraid of talking about money or estate planning matters, we often just don’t think we have the time. The role of the female is still that of the family hub– mother, daughter, spouse, partner, sister. Being the family hub requires a great deal of time and effort. Add to that our occupational responsibilities and community obligations and it’s perfectly understandable why we focus on the “now” and not the “then.” Yes, we are fully aware of the fact that if we take some time now, we could make “then” better. However, as a single parent when: a presentation to a major client is due on Monday, the kids have to be taken to gymnastics and birthday parties and Sunday school, Mom needs help with her new ottoman, Sis wants a review of the web site of your annual “sisterhood vacation” hotel, as chair of the silent auction committee you have to complete the donations list by Friday night, and you still have to exercise, cook, and pick up the cleaning (housekeeper not in the budget), “converting my 401(k) into …” doesn’t really make it to the top of the list. Next, is the fact that we know we’re the hub and the emotional gravity accompanying that realization. I don’t know too many women who readily give thought to when they won’t be around to see their grandchildren, nieces’ weddings, or best friend’s daughter’s college graduation. It is a very painful and counterintuitive thought for women. Fear has little to do with it. We simply love our families and friends and cannot fathom not being there for them. Nevertheless, Ladies, as painful, counterintuitive, and time consuming as it may be, we owe it to our families and ourselves to sacrifice a manicure, to miss a committee meeting, to reschedule a conference call, to say a prayer and let Sis choose the hotel, so we can take care of “now” and “then” now. The list of reasons for doing this is not exhaustive and are compelling: Your retirement savings may be dwindling unnecessarily; Your widowed father living a few states away may have a new BFF with less than charitable thoughts about Dad’s annuity; An in-state college may not afford your son the best educational opportunity for his mechanical engineering career; You might be able to withdraw income now from grandma’s IRA (progressive grandma!); Your current income may be beneficial for a retirement vehicle that may not be as readily available when your income rises past a certain point; You may want to go on sabbatical but, who’s going to mind the store, literally; Instead of a place where Mom will be bored silly playing checkers, you may want to send her cruising 6 months a year; and You want your partner to be able to visit you immediately after major surgery. Minding our retirement and estate matters now actually makes us, the family hub, stronger. If you want, I’ll take notes at your next committee meeting, so you can meet with a reputable CFP.
With This Estate Plan, You May Take My Coat
Individuals sometimes ask me, why, if they are not millionaires, do they need an estate plan, ending with something akin to, “I’m not rich; I don’t have anything.” My response is usually the typical T&E (Trusts and Estates) mantra, “You don’t need to be ‘rich” to need an estate plan.” Furthermore, the converse is generally true – the smaller estates need equal, if not more, protection. Moreover, non-millionaire employees are “richer” than they think. Like an IRS person once said, “Stop thinking it’s your money.” So, if you\’ve been steadily employed, don’t think that the federal government sees you as a pauper, irrespective of your current financial woes. Acknowledging that these are horrendous economic times citizens worldwide, I must say that millions are also fortunate. They are employed; have retirement or profit-sharing plans; have life insurance; and they have a house, which may be worth less than what they paid for but they still own a home. My “Who Killed Kenny” winter down coat is worth less than what was paid for it but, considering January in Chicago, it would take a permanent move to my favorite desert oasis to get me to sell that coat. Pardon my slight digression, though I think you got the point: It may feel like you’re managing paycheck-to-paycheck, but even so, you may find solace in the midst of this economic maelstrom. Consider your retirement plan. It may have taken a beating over the summer, like most of our financial accounts. However, you may still be able to use your plan to your advantage in the long-term and/or to your loved ones advantage. The 2 most popular retirement accounts are 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). A 401(k) is typically a qualified plan where your employer matches your contributions. Teachers often have 403(b) accounts that operate in basically the same way as a 401(k). While 401(k) contributions are tax deductible, generally any income earned is taxed on withdrawal. Additionally, once you reach 70 ½, you must make a required minimum distribution (RMD). With a 401(k), your spouse is presumed to be the beneficiary, so if you designate other beneficiaries in your will, your spouse must waive their right to the distribution in order for the other beneficiaries to take. Also, because 401(k) plans are governed by federal law, civil union partners cannot be designated spousal beneficiaries of 401(k) plans. IRAs provide a little more flexibility than 401(k)s, because there is no RMD at any age and withdrawals from Roth IRAs are not taxed. However, the maximum contribution is significantly lower than that of a 401(k) and an IRA account may not even be available if you also have a 401(k). Still, unlike a 401(k), with an IRA, there is no presumption of a spousal beneficiary, so who you names as beneficiary, even if it is your civil union partner or same-gender spouse, is the beneficiary. If that person passes away, then the beneficiary will be the person named next or if there’s no contingent, the distribution will follow the state’s testamentary code. Equally important, you can provide for your grandchildren by creating IRAs for them, so that the distribution that would be made to your children is instead rolled over into accounts for your grandchildren. So before you think you’re “not rich,” consider your retirement plan. Basic it may be, but if properly implemented, it could provide you with comfort like my \”Who Killed Kenny\” coat on those cold, January, Chicago days.