Money-Saving Tips with Estate Planning
This may sound counterintuitive coming from a lawyer, but my practice is purposely designed around protecting families and loving interests and saving my clients money. Yes, and I am a lawyer and said, “I want to save folks money.” So for the next few months, the focal point of my blog posts will be how you can save money through estate planning. Of course, I’ll digress occasionally, but I’ll return to the course in due time. Sometimes the discussion will be about how certain estate planning processes clients experience may be costly or inexpensive depending on the approach. Other times, the discussion will address decisions that may be costly or may save you a bundle depending on various considerations and scenarios. So let’s get started and today’s piece will cover very basic ways to save with wills or, more accurately, the lack of one or keeping the cost of probate down if the estate requires one. Money Saver Tips: In Illinois, if the estate is less than or equal to $100,000.00, probate and its accompanying court costs may not be necessary. If at any time your estate grows to more than $100,000.00, a valid will that is kept current may save your heirs thousands in having to open a significant estate where there is no will or the will is invalid. A valid will has 2 witnesses and is not handwritten. Save some money and don’t get it notarized. Wills in Illinois do not require notarization. When calculating the size of your estate for probate purposes, do not include life insurance; life insurance and retirement plans are not part of the probate estate. So if all you have is a $50,000 home and no creditors, see Money Saver Tip #1. If your estate is more than $100,000.00 and you aren’t completely sure about how to distribute your assets, don’t use a DIY program or a Big Box Store will-in-a-box. Refer to Money Saver Tip #2 for the possible consequences. Tune in next week for money-saving tips with estate planning.
With This Estate Plan, You May Take My Coat
Individuals sometimes ask me, why, if they are not millionaires, do they need an estate plan, ending with something akin to, “I’m not rich; I don’t have anything.” My response is usually the typical T&E (Trusts and Estates) mantra, “You don’t need to be ‘rich” to need an estate plan.” Furthermore, the converse is generally true – the smaller estates need equal, if not more, protection. Moreover, non-millionaire employees are “richer” than they think. Like an IRS person once said, “Stop thinking it’s your money.” So, if you\’ve been steadily employed, don’t think that the federal government sees you as a pauper, irrespective of your current financial woes. Acknowledging that these are horrendous economic times citizens worldwide, I must say that millions are also fortunate. They are employed; have retirement or profit-sharing plans; have life insurance; and they have a house, which may be worth less than what they paid for but they still own a home. My “Who Killed Kenny” winter down coat is worth less than what was paid for it but, considering January in Chicago, it would take a permanent move to my favorite desert oasis to get me to sell that coat. Pardon my slight digression, though I think you got the point: It may feel like you’re managing paycheck-to-paycheck, but even so, you may find solace in the midst of this economic maelstrom. Consider your retirement plan. It may have taken a beating over the summer, like most of our financial accounts. However, you may still be able to use your plan to your advantage in the long-term and/or to your loved ones advantage. The 2 most popular retirement accounts are 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). A 401(k) is typically a qualified plan where your employer matches your contributions. Teachers often have 403(b) accounts that operate in basically the same way as a 401(k). While 401(k) contributions are tax deductible, generally any income earned is taxed on withdrawal. Additionally, once you reach 70 ½, you must make a required minimum distribution (RMD). With a 401(k), your spouse is presumed to be the beneficiary, so if you designate other beneficiaries in your will, your spouse must waive their right to the distribution in order for the other beneficiaries to take. Also, because 401(k) plans are governed by federal law, civil union partners cannot be designated spousal beneficiaries of 401(k) plans. IRAs provide a little more flexibility than 401(k)s, because there is no RMD at any age and withdrawals from Roth IRAs are not taxed. However, the maximum contribution is significantly lower than that of a 401(k) and an IRA account may not even be available if you also have a 401(k). Still, unlike a 401(k), with an IRA, there is no presumption of a spousal beneficiary, so who you names as beneficiary, even if it is your civil union partner or same-gender spouse, is the beneficiary. If that person passes away, then the beneficiary will be the person named next or if there’s no contingent, the distribution will follow the state’s testamentary code. Equally important, you can provide for your grandchildren by creating IRAs for them, so that the distribution that would be made to your children is instead rolled over into accounts for your grandchildren. So before you think you’re “not rich,” consider your retirement plan. Basic it may be, but if properly implemented, it could provide you with comfort like my \”Who Killed Kenny\” coat on those cold, January, Chicago days.
Caring for the Truly Needy with Trusts
Parents and individuals with elderly loved ones occasionally have more than the usual health, education, maintenance, and reasonable support (aka “HEMS”) issues in terms of planning for the future. I was a babysitter for a number of years for a young girl stricken with severe cerebral palsy. Her parents were in their late 40s\’/early 50\’s. Mom stayed at home and Dad owned a small business. I always wondered what her parents would do if her father suddenly lost his small business or if something, heaven forbid, happened to him. Certain types of trusts provide a unique way of planning for scenarios just like that. They’re called “Special Needs Trusts” and are carefully drafted to ensure that the special needs of loved ones such as disabled children, parents, or the elderly are properly cared for. You may be thinking that the government provides benefits, and wondering about the value of these instruments. Well, as many disabled individuals, elderly, and their family members can tell you, government benefits are rarely sufficient en toto to cover all of the expenditures and provide a quality of life that was provided when one or both parents’ or family members’ income supplemented those benefits. So Special Needs Trusts provide a way to truly provide for those who will not be able to provide for themselves because of disability or infirmity. However, as mentioned, these trusts must be drafted carefully so as not to create a situation where your loved one suddenly becomes ineligible for government benefits because of an increased income. Certain benefit programs are need-based and income from a Special Needs Trust may result in disqualifying your loved one from the program. Again, this doesn’t happen just to the disabled, but folks receiving Medicare and certain Veteran’s benefits are also affected. So the good news is your attorney has a way, with a Special Needs Trust to help you provide for a disabled or elderly loved one. The caveat is that your attorney must be mindful of the needs-based benefit programs that can turn a good supplemental plan into a plan made of quicksand.
Thanks But No Thanks: The Benefits of Disclaiming Aunt Val\’s Gift
Occasionally, a person may receive a gift under a will or a trust that they think would be more appropriate for their descendants. In these situations – and if the trust is drafted appropriately – the person usually has a legal right to say, “Thanks, but no thanks,” to the gift. At that point, the gift then “passes” to the person’s descendant(s) or beneficiary(ies). This means that the law will consider that initial recipient dead, i.e., having “predeceased” the testator, with respect to that particular gift and, as a result, the proposed recipient’s descendants take the gift. Why would you disclaim a gift? You don’t need the gift but your descendants might. For example, if Grandpa passes away leaving his house to your father, but Dad has his own home and a retirement condo, Dad may decide that you – a young professional with student loans – may benefit from owning the home more than Dad. So, Dad says in a writing that appropriately describes the gift and is delivered to the appropriate party, “Thanks, but no thanks. I, Dad, am unequivocally and expressly refusing the house … bequeathed to me by my father …” Once Dad’s disclaimer is accepted, if you\’re the only child, then you get the house. If you have siblings, then, generally, you will need to determine with your siblings how best to divide the interest in the house. You can’t afford the responsibility. If you and your partner are urbane empty-nesters, perfectly content with your 2-bedroom city dwelling, do you want the 4-bedroom home in the suburbs that Aunt Val left you with all the maintenance and tax bills that come with it? Probably not. However, your adopted daughter who now has newborn twins and a 3-year-old could probably use the extra space. So you say in writing, “Thanks but no thanks” to Aunt Val’s lush suburban family home. You want to avoid creditors. If you refuse a gift, a creditor claim cannot attach to your interest in the gift because under the law you never had any interest in the gift once your disclaimer is accepted. However, the area of the law using disclaimers as a way to avoid creditors is rapidly closing this loophole, so creditor claim avoidance probably isn’t the most prudent use of this testamentary mechanism. Disclaimers, simple at first blush, are like most legal tools – devilish in the details. If you’re considering disclaiming a gift, below are a few points to discuss with your attorney: Whether or not the property will be completely yours if it is currently held in joint tenancy with you and 2 other tenants; The irrevocability of disclaiming; Your action to date regarding the interest in the property; and Tax implications, which should be considered sooner rather than later. In the world of wills, trusts, and estate planning, the intent of the testator is a cardinal rule. Yet, sometimes the intent of the testator and the needs of the heirs conflict. Using a disclaimer may help resolve that conflict.
Who Takes the Eggs? ART and Estate Planning Considerations
As technology’s digits crawl through the nooks and crannies of our physical world and cyberspace, the legal consequences and questions emerging keep even us non-IP lawyers quite busy. Considering assisted reproductive technology (\”ART\”), family law was the premier practice area for getting caught in ART\’s web. Few lawyers realized the effects ART would have on estate planning and, even as the effects became clear, only a fraction of states passed laws providing legal guidance. Fortunately, Illinois is a state that considered ART in its laws and included laws for in vitro fertilization in the Parentage Act. Additionally, the Probate Act states that children born after a parent’s death (“posthumous” children) are to be considered having been born during the parent’s lifetime. So, what does all this technolegalese mean? Well, in terms of inheritance and/or estate planning laws, it means conversations should be had between Illinois spouses if conception is a challenge or an impossibility for one or both spouses.* The conversations are necessary because of 2 vital estate planning tools often used by couples, Health Care Powers of Attorney (“HCPOA”) and Property Powers of Attorney (“PPOA”), which can also provide instruction for ART cases. Yes, lawyers love acronyms. In Illinois, a posthumous child born via ART typically emerges in 1 of 3 ways: Use of frozen sperm; Use of a frozen embryo; or Use of a frozen egg. Furthermore, obtaining frozen sperm or eggs may not only occur after incapacity but also may occur after death, which is when estate planning mechanisms are triggered. When creating an estate plan, couples usually consider a bunch of “what ifs,” e.g., “what if I become disabled while we’re still in the “prime” of our lives and haven’t had kids yet?” A HCPOA is a tool that requires making those decisions but, consequently, eases the fears associated with the “what ifs.” Accordingly, when considering ART, a HCPOA could, for example, authorize the implantation of frozen sperm or eggs. Of course, other considerations would naturally follow, such as, how one abled-parent and one disabled parent would raise a child. Still, ART combined with the law creates a reasonable and protected possibility for having a family, when that likelihood, outside of adoption, didn’t exist before. Another equally interesting issue relates to the PPOA. But, you say, “That’s about property.” Yes, it is. In a 1993 California decision, Hecht v. Superior Court, which is used by several states, the Court determined that frozen genetic reproductive material, such as sperm and eggs, is property for the purpose of leaving a gift in a will (aka “devise”). Here, you might think the conversation would be easy – women can leave their eggs to their partners; but, not so fast. What if the eggs are frozen, then the relationship is legally dissolved, the donor spouse remarries, and then passes away? Who gets the eggs if the second spouse doesn’t want any (more) kids? She could disclaim them and pass them to her descendants or siblings; that would be interesting. The future brothers and sisters of the former partner? Should the reproductive material be destroyed? Who do you think should get the eggs? * The term “spouses” and \”partners\” are interchanged in this context because the terms are synonymous in Illinois law.
The 3 Tenancies and Your Planning: It’s Not about Rent
In the legal field, we use and create terms and phrases that sound familiar to non-legal professionals, but are strangers when a legal professional provides the actual definition. Take, for example the term, “tenancy.” It sounds like it’s related to renting property, and it is – sort of, sometimes as when you’re discussing leases. However, when discussing legacy planning, it’s a much larger animal. In legacy planning, lawyers primarily discuss 3 tenancies, most of which involve real property or bank account ownership, not renting. Tenancy in common is the most basic type of tenancy ownership. A tenants in common relationship between 2 people over a house, for example, means that one party controls interest in one half of the house, and the other party controls interest over the other half. Either party can sell, lease, mortgage, or devise their interest in half of the property. However, if the other party passes away, generally the surviving party does not get the other half of the property; the survivor is left with his or her interest alone. The remaining half is either bequeathed or passed to the decedent’s heirs via state law.People are rarely tenants in common with respect to bank accounts; this type of arrangement is usually crafted for prenuptial agreements or settlement agreements and, then, the focus is often the parties’ contribution to the account. Joint tenancy with rights of survivorship, on the other hand, allows the surviving party in the above example with the house to own the whole house. Joint accounts are also very common with respect to bank accounts, checking or saving. So, if Grandpa has a bank account and you are on the account as a joint holder, when Grandpa passes away, all of the funds in that account become yours, under most circumstances.However, joint tenancy is the animal that can become a beast for parents trying to leave property for children. Placing a house in joint tenancy with right of survivorship to a child could trigger a taxable event for the child. Additionally, suppose you have 2 children, the house, and life insurance. The house is worth $200,000 and the life insurance benefit is $200,000. You might think that leaving the house to one child and designating the other as beneficiary on the life insurance policy would be an even split. Yet, the child with the house may have to pay estate or gift taxes on the home, leaving the gifts to your children unequal. Tenancy by the entirety is joint tenancy for married couples. This may seem straightforward because most people know that transfers between husband and wife are not taxable events. But, what if the transfer was from husband to husband or wife to wife? Because the IRS doesn’t recognize husband to husband or wife to wife transfers, the survivor of the couple may be facing a taxable event like the child with the house. So when thinking about gifts or transfers of property, careful planning is needed to avoid these non-rental sticky wickets.
Why There\’s a \”Trust\” in Trustee, Part 2
In Part 1 of this series, I discussed why one should be careful in selecting a trustee. Family members are often considered the most trustworthy with respect to family matters, so people typically select them as trustees. However, this endearing gesture can cause serious problems later: Trust assets could be inadvertently wiped out. A trustee is usually responsible for managing the trust assets. If the trust is significant, the trustee should either have the required financial investment background or the ability to wisely choose someone with the needed background to act as the trust investment advisor. If the trustee is not well informed about investment matters relevant to the trust assets and does not employ someone who is, then the trust funds could dissipate leaving the terms of the trust unfulfilled, and probably one or more displeased beneficiaries. This last point is particularly important if the trust isn’t large, but the beneficiaries depend on its income for health and educational support, for example. Valid claims could go unanswered; or a trust claim could be ignored. The trustee is responsible for responding to or initiating litigation on behalf of the trust. So if a long lost family member who would have been provided for had their whereabouts been known, emerges claiming they should receive under the trust, the trustee should properly address that claim. If the trustee is a family member, however, the problem becomes one of bias against that claim because a valid claim could dilute the current beneficiaries’ shares, possibly including the trustee’s share. Another problem is that it takes time to respond to these claims, time that a family member may not have. Equally important is a trust may have a claim that needs to be litigated. But, if the trustee does not recognize the claim issue, a potential financial award for the beneficiaries may go unnoticed. Co-trustees don’t always agree. While the grantor may have gotten along well with both individuals, when it comes time to make a distribution decision or another decision involving the trust, the co-trustees may not see eye-to-eye and both could have valid perspectives. This type of disagreement starts many long-term family arguments resulting in costly court battles. If nothing else, by choosing a corporate fiduciary, the family will be at peace with each other and at war with someone else. Trust administration responsibilities are time consuming and numerous. The following is an incomplete list of trustee duties: Distributing beneficiary shares Providing a regular accounting to beneficiaries Paying debts, taxes, fees and expenses associated with the trust administration Giving notice to guardians or legal representatives of beneficiaries who are minors or incapacitated Executing documents required for trust administration Settling claims against the trust, not just from possible beneficiaries but from estate creditors Buying insurance for trust assets Perhaps now you’re thinking that a Last Will and Testament may circumvent this “trustee” matter, but that\’s not necessarily true. A Will’s executor or “personal representative” often has the same responsibilities as a trustee. So, establishing a Will not only requires delegation to the executor some of the responsibilities above, but in Illinois, it also entails more costs and more time because of probate. Therefore, it is critical to resist the urge to select a family member as a trustee – or executor – without first giving the decision the thought and discussion it deserves.
Why There\’s a \”Trust\” in Trustee, Part 1 of 2
Trust and Estates 101: No trust will fail because it doesn’t have a trustee. Thus, if a trust creator (\”settlor\” or \”grantor\”) doesn’t designate a trustee but has a beneficiary, the court will appoint a trustee for the beneficiary. Why? Because the beneficiary must be able to hold someone accountable in court if the terms of the trust aren’t met. So, the trustee has an obligation to the beneficiary or, in legal terms, the trustee is in a fiduciary relationship with the beneficiary. As a fiduciary, the trustee is held to a high standard of duty to the trust and primary beneficiaries. A trustee must act wisely with respect to the trust assets, managing them to both preserve and, if possible, grow the assets. The trustee can\’t use the assets for their own benefit, even if they are also a beneficiary, without consent from the other beneficiary or beneficiaries. Additionally, the trustee can\’t give the beneficiary’s rights to receive the assets to someone else unless the terms say otherwise. Example: If the Trust terms say only Beneficiary Barbara can receive a Trust distribution, Collector Carter shouldn\’t receive a distribution without a court order. The right to receive that distribution belongs to Barbara only. Finally, if the trust has multiple beneficiaries, the trustee can\’t favor one beneficiary’s needs over the other unless, again, the trust dictates such. This is one reason why, occasionally, bank trustees (\”corporate fiduciaries\”) are often preferred over close friends or family members. And it\’s also why family members sometimes refuse to act – they don\’t want to subject themselves to a potential lawsuit. Therefore, a trustee should be someone the settlor thinks will be loyal to the terms of the trust and not compromised by a relationship with a beneficiary, or a creditor for that matter. This is also why considerable thought should be given to who you name as trustee. Part 2