Important Digression from Windsor Analysis – Still Civil Rights
I recently posted the following on my personal Facebook page because it was Sunday and I don\’t work on Sundays. However, because I am an African-American, female, lawyer, an example of the mixed ideals that can be realized, and have experienced first-hand how those ideals can be jeopardized by hatred and ignorance, I am compelled to share it here: May we all recognize that our country, the United States of America, has yet to be free from the tentacles of hatred, racism, sexism, and all the ugly isms that comprise the darker side of humanity. These tentacles pervade every system that we and our children depend on, including the \”justice\” and \”educational\” systems. This summer, Americans witnessed the turning back of civil rights to the days where: it was acceptable to kill, rape, or beat someone because of the color of their skin or their gender; it was acceptable to preclude citizens from voting because of the color of their skin; it was acceptable to treat women as objects to be used and discarded in employment because men could not control themselves; and it was acceptable to erect and sustain barriers to educational equality for people of color. So, sadly, let us recognize that the days of uplifting the whole of our country, where equality for all instead of economy for some was the objective and seen as a duty of most of our citizens, is over. Some of us will continue to fight for equality but many of us will not even when the U.S. spells \”us.\”
4 Key Concerns on Estate Planning for Disabled Children
A number of articles in The Shark Free Zone address the bad idea of designating a minor as a primary beneficiary. Single parents especially struggle with this issue, which is why “it takes a village,” is more than political rhetoric. Another issue parents and family members struggle with is the unfortunate circumstance of managing the car of a disabled child or loved one. Yet, it is even more critical to plan for unfortunate events when you are the caregiver of a disabled person. As usual, examples often help distinguish bad planning from poor planning but this time we’ll just look at a scenario and the resulting considerations. Twenty years ago, Kelly and Sean’s daughter, Carrie was born mentally and physically disabled. As a result, Kelly and Sean decided that Kelly would remain at home to care for Carrie and the family would depend on Sean’s paycheck and Carrie’s Social Security Disability Income (“SSDI”). About a month ago, Kelly and Carrie were involved in a car accident and ended up with a settlement award of $50,000 after medical expenses were paid. Fortunately, neither Kelly nor Carrie was severely injured but the incident shook Kelly considerably. So she and Sean finally had the “what if” discussion about the possibility of something tragic happening to one or both of them. If one or both of them died, who would care for Carrie and what would that look like? Well, Kelly and Sean have several issues to consider, including: Guardianship v. Powers of Attorney. Carrie is an adult and, in Illinois, obtaining guardianship for a disabled adult is a lengthy and costly process. To avoid that process, powers of attorney for Carrie might be useful. The question of usefulness hinges on the severity of Carrie’s mental disability with respect to legal capacity needed to grant authority provided in powers of attorney. Adverse Implications of Government Assistance. Irrespective of who dies, if sufficient means are not available to ensure Carrie’s basic needs – food, shelter, clothing, and medical care – are met during the remainder of her life, she may need additional government assistance, such as Medicaid. However, when someone on Medicaid receives an inheritance, they may become temporarily ineligible for Medicaid. So particular testamentary planning, such as “special needs trusts,” may be needed. Sufficient Life Insurance. If Sean passes away, the question is then, how much of a death benefit is needed. Also, if Kelly predeceased Sean, who would be the contingent beneficiary able to act on Carrie’s behalf. Appropriate Fiduciaries. If both Kelly and Sean die, the question again is who will be able to financially and compassionately manage Carrie’s estate and how would that estate be structured? Caring for a child with mental or physical challenges has at least one commonality with caring for a child with no challenges: the need for a careful, caring, and protective plan in the event the parent is no longer able to provide needed care because the ability or inability of our loved ones doesn\’t change the fact that they are our loved ones.
Women & Obamacare: It Hurts Not to Know
Recently, I attended a great program on women’s healthcare. The discussion included how the Affordable Care Act would affect our healthcare and the decisions we made. So please read this article and share it with all the women you know. Thank you, Affinity Community Services for hosting, Kathy Waligora of the Illinois Maternal and Child Health Coalition, the Chicago Women’s Health Center (CWHC), and Dr. Theresa Jones for sharing such valuable information. Resources to the topics are at the end of this article. Because estate planning and financial planning are closely related, health insurance is a key component to successful estate planning. Without appropriate health insurance, everything you own is at risk of loss … to a hospital bill or to long-term care. So no estate planning involving asset distribution will matter because the hospital bill or caregiving expenses will have created a gaping doughnut of an estate for you. The exponential increase of healthcare costs over the last couple of decades is one reason why fewer and fewer individuals and families considered estate planning: with little or no insurance, planning for the transfer of assets would be an exercise in futility. However, that risk for millions has been and is being mitigated by the Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or “Obamacare”). Before the ACA, 40 million Americans had no health insurance and millions of children would never be able to obtain it because of pre-existing conditions. In 2010, when the ACA passed, the number of uninsured Americans were reduced by 10%. And though the ACA has come under intense fire, by 2014, millions more of Americans and small businesses will receive 50% of credits to help offset the cost of coverage. Additionally, the cost of coverage for women will be fair. Until the ACA was passed, women were made to pay more for healthcare insurance than men and, unlike what most individuals thought, it was not because most women could become pregnant. So why were women paying more for health insurance? That’s a good question that insurance companies have yet to provide an answer for. But they won’t have to because on January 1, 2014, gender will be eliminated as a criteria for determining health insurance costs. Moreover, preventive and wellness services, especially for women, that were not available in many insurance plans will be available to women at no cost through the ACA. The critical need for these services is highlighted by the recent news about celebrity Angelina Jolie’s healthcare decisions. Included in the free preventive and wellness services mandated by the ACA are: BRCA counseling about genetic testing for women who at high risk, Anemia screening for pregnant women, Cervical cancer screening, Domestic and interpersonal violence screening and counselling, Folic acid supplements for women who could become pregnant, Osteoporosis screening for women over 60, and Well-woman visits. The ACA mandates these services included in 22 preventive services because legislators and the current administration recognizes that preventive maintenance and reformed and regulated healthcare for all Americans ultimately reduces healthcare costs across the board for our country, community, and loved ones. Another important feature of the ACA is Medicaid reform. However, states must agree to take advantage of the new Medicaid rules. If Illinois agreed to embrace the rules, it could man billions of dollars and thousands of jobs. However, the 3.8% surtax on families with household incomes of $200,000 or more has fueled the uproar mentioned earlier. This could result in these households being taxed at a marginal rate of near 45-50% and nobody likes to pay taxes. Still, Illinois Senate Bill 26 (SB 26) is pending with regard to this question. As of 5/21 the bill was passed, after several notes, to the House Committee. As I said at the top, information about our healthcare and how to use that information is too important – not just to us but also to our families – not to share, so please pay this forward and let women (and men) know that \”affordable healthcare is available to you.\” Helpful Resources Illinois Congressional Representatives, http://www.ilga.gov/house/ Health Insurance 101, http://101.communitycatalyst.org/aca_provisions/ Illinois Maternal and Child Health Coalition, http://www.ilmaternal.org/
Infants, Stairwells & Burning a Million Dollars
Wealth preservation aka “asset protection” is slowly rising to the top of the mainstream American lexicon, much like estate planning did a couple of decades ago. However, though related, the 2 activities are quite different. A solid estate plan’s end goal is to ensure that your intended beneficiaries obtain what you intend for them in the most efficient and least adverse manner possible. Retirement and tax planning are a substantial part of the estate planning process but the primary beneficiary at the end of the game is someone else, not you. Conversely, a solid wealth preservation plan will ensure that you don’t go broke before, during, or after retirement and fulfill your intentions toward your beneficiaries, tying it into estate planning. But the primary beneficiary of wealth preservation is not someone else; the primary beneficiary is you. Estate planning and wealth preservation are technically linked because the core documents and the fiduciary roles are primarily the same. Both include trusts and, consequently, trustees. Both might even include a LLC. The fundamental distinction is jurisdictional, i.e., what law governs the trust. Typically the laws in states that have asset protection statutes and are referred to as Domestic Asset Protection Trusts (DAPTs) govern wealth preservation instruments whose jurisdiction is in the U.S. Instruments whose jurisdiction is outside the U.S. are governed by the laws, or lack thereof, in those particular countries and are known as “offshore” trusts. Now before you start getting all antsy with thoughts of tax evasion, let me squash that thought like a bug. The only way to ensure that one doesn’t incur Uncle Sam’s penalties is by being completely compliant with the U.S. tax code. Now before going too far into the different schools of thought surrounding DAPTs and offshore trusts, you may be thinking, “I don’t have a gazillion dollars, so this doesn’t apply to me.” But before I lose you to Facebook or an incoming text message – wait. If you live in America, you live in one of the most lawsuit crazed countries in the world. So while you may not have a gazillion dollars, consider the following stats: 99% of doctors in high risk specialties will be sued; 75% of doctors in low-risk practice areas will be sued; Every 6 minutes a child under the age of 5 is treated for an injury sustained on a residential stairwell; In 2012, a woman was awarded about $833,000 for an injury sustained on her landlord\’s property ; Over a 10-year period, 15-21 lawsuits were filed per 100 architect firms; I won’t mention lawyers, it’s a given, people hate us, think we have deep pockets, so they sue us. So if you know your liability insurance won’t cover a potential lawsuit or the cost of litigation in successfully defending an unscrupulous claimant, how comfortable are you holding a “fire sale”? If you’re not thrilled about selling your home and liquidating all of your assets, including your retirement portfolio, to settle a claim, then wealth preservation may be needed sooner rather than later. Then again, maybe you have a million dollars to burn…
5 Mentoring Tips from the Grave
As a wills and trusts attorney, frequently, clients or friends ask me how they or their parents can prevent young, adult beneficiaries from wasting their “hard-earned” inheritance. I explain that this can be managed in at least 5 ways: Use hard cold facts and an iron club. Tell them that the money was hard-earned by you and don’t leave them anything but a videotape of the family history. Leave all the money and possessions to charity. Bribe the youngsters and hope for the best. Of course, these are 2 actions that make most lawyers’ skin crawl. Educate the little people from the time they get their first piggy bank from Grandpa. Use conditional provisions that don’t “offend public policy.” This means that, while you can’t disinherit your child from marrying outside his ethnicity and can’t tell him he won’t get a dime unless he divorces his current spouse, you can cut the cord if he becomes a lifetime criminal. You can shorten the cord if she becomes a lifetime substance abuser. And you can make the cord’s length dependent on grades and gainful employment. “Staggered mentoring,” which I’ve mentioned before, is another tool. With a “staggered mentoring” provision, Grandpa leaves Hermoine 30% of her pot of gold when she turns 25, another 30% when she turns 30, and the balance at the age of 35. My favorite is a combination of 3 through 5, but as my favorite contracts professor said, “If it walks like a duck and squawks like a duck, it ain’t a beagle.” So, if Hermoine’s been in and out of jail since the age of 16 and she’s 25 now, education, at least of the financial planning kind, isn’t probably going to work.
Marriage Is Not a \”Cell Phone\”
Reading the New York Times commentary and analysis of the Supreme Court\’s hearing on the Prop 8 case involving California\’s same-sex marriage issue, what struck deeper than anything else was the seeming reluctance of the Court to do what it is appointed to do: protect the rights of those United States persons who have been discriminated against, marginalized, or otherwise made to suffer injustice. While an \”all-or-nothing\” choice can be frustrating and using the force of law to make a large minority accept a trend that improves the civil rights of thousands instead of ruling on a decision where a large majority has issue with whether the hunting of birds flying over a particular state violates an international treaty, U.S. Supreme Court justices are appointed for just that reason. It has always been my understanding that the Court, because it is the final arbiter of American justice, is supposed to make frustrating, difficult decisions when justice calls for such decisions to be made. What was the majority\’s opinion when race was removed from the de facto \”definition\” of marriage in Loving v. Virginia? A U.S. President and 118 members of Congress decided to define \”marriage\” and the distribution of more than 1000 federal benefits that accompany this definition for millions of U.S. citizens. So, is the argument that because we don\’t have a 2:1 margin in the country supporting same-sex marriage that we are stuck with this draconian definition that is based on \”history,\” and that history\’s rationale is that the purpose of marriage is procreation? Are we not in 2013 with the Internet and assisted reproductive technology? And, speaking of technology, \”newer than cell phones\” is an insulting comparison to a relationship with all the hallmarks of a marriage except the label and, more importantly the rights that are afforded that \”label.\” The cell phone analogy could arguably be found swimming in the ocean of reductio ad absurdum, which is arguably surprising coming from a Justice of the United States Supreme Court. As Justice Kennedy pointed out, more than 40,000 children in California alone are subjected to the marginalization of their families by a law that has no place in a civil society. The Justice referred to the emotional stigmatization these children face, but what about the financial benefits that the federal government attributes to married couples? If a child is living in a home with same-sex parents who, e.g., cannot take advantage of filing jointly on federal tax returns and discounts provided in medical and other benefits via ERISA and other government agencies, then money is being taken away from that family and, therefore, that child. So while I applaud Justice Kennedy for directing the public\’s attention to the children who are adversely affected by the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and its proponents, in my authentically humble opinion, the argument should have and could have gone further than what appears to be a gratuitous tug at the heartstrings. Becoming a lawyer, I was told and always take to heart that those with great gifts have an equally great responsibility and must not turn away from that responsibility when it calls for making difficult choices, such as whether to provide all U.S. citizens with all of the rights of marriage or no U.S. citizen with a cohesive, civil, and just legal foundation for loving, committed relationships.
5 Reasons Why the \”Permanent\” Exemption Matters to You
Many people probably know that Congress made permanent the Federal estate tax, which is $5 million, indexed for inflation, per person and $10 million per married couple. This means that approximately 98% of Americans will not have taxable estates on their deaths with respect to the government’s estate tax. A sigh of relief for many families could be heard across the land. However, folks shouldn\’t sigh too heavily because the same matters that existed before for individuals and families were not eliminated by Congress’s act. So the following are 5 issues that have nothing to do with the federal estate tax but are still very important to protecting yourself and your family: You have children. Even families with modest-sized estates should ensure that their children are cared for according to their wishes and values if a tragedy occurs. Minor and disabled children are of primary concern. I’ve written before that without a will that nominates a guardian, minor or disabled children may be placed with someone a parent would consider less than ideal. Beyond that, consider retirement proceeds. If a minor or even young adult child is the beneficiary on a retirement account, depending on the language of that account, Uncle Sam may still take a large bite or equally troubling, a relatively young adult may come into a large sum of money in one fell swoop. You aren\’t married BUT you are in a loving committed relationship with someone. So that means your significant other or partner, while being able to benefit from your lifetime exemption, cannot benefit from portability. Also, the same issue with respect to retirement proceeds as mentioned above also apply in this scenario. If your unmarried in the eyes of the federal or state government but you and your partner have a child, just bring the issues of number one right on down. You are a professional or small business (smallbiz) owner. Unfortunately, we Americans are a litigious bunch. If we believe we have suffered an injury related to professional services, e.g., doctor, lawyer, dentist, or a small business, then many of us have no problem pursuing litigation that will cost much more than the malpractice insurance covers. Estate taxes have little or nothing to do with covering your assets from multimillion dollar litigation. You have income producing assets. The federal government and many state governments tax beneficiaries on 2 levels: estate and income. If your daughter\’s trust has income producing assets, such as the 3-flat apartment building you gave her, then there is a likelihood that the trust will have to pay income tax. How much depends on how well your team works to protect you. Still, like number 3, this has nothing to do with estate taxes. You live in a \”decoupled\” state. Some states are \”coupled\” with the Federal estate tax regime, meaning their state\’s lifetime estate tax exemption is identical to the Federal government\’s. However 28 states are decoupled, and most of those states, unlike Illinois, have a significantly lower estate tax exemption amount. So that means that while estate tax may not be due to Uncle Sam, it may be due to Uncle Quinn – Illinois\’ governor, for example. Estate taxes were a primary focus of estate planning because no one likes paying taxes. Well, estate taxes are no longer a primary focus and those other issues still need to be considered, just like they did before December 31, 2012.
Preventing Family Feuds for the Smallbiz Owner
At a Chicago Bar Association’s Solo/Small Firm Committee Meeting, I gave remarks on why estate planning is not a “basic” endeavor. A favorite example was a about Ms. Small Biz (Ms. SMB) who was married to Mr. Manager and had College-Age Children. It’s a favorite example because it identifies the issues contemporary families comprised of smallbiz owners may confront with respect to business planning, disability, death, and succession planning: Ms. SMB is the sole proprietor of a small, lucrative, and growing graphic design firm. She has 3 employees in addition to herself, and her son works part time during the school-year and full-time during the summer. Her daughter, however, has no interest in the business. But Ms. SMB has great vision for the business with a Pinterest page, a blog, and even a design auction website. Her husband is satisfied with his position as a midlevel manager with a software company. So the family is happy and enjoying its status. For several years now, Ms. SMB has been consistently reaping the fruits of 10 years of hard work and wants to ensure that in the event of her disability or death, her family and business are safe and wrapped up in a neat little package. So how should the estate planning attorney assist? First, we should assess the following: her stand-alone net worth; when the last time, if ever, was her business valued; what is the best legal entity for her business (at this point it should not be a sole proprietorship); who will run the business – digital assets and all – if she suffers a long-term illness; upon her death does she want the business sold or transferred to her son or her son and employees, or family and employees; who will wind the business up if she wants it sold; and if it is sold who gets what and in what form? Undoubtedly, Ms. SMB will need a will or a trust. She will also need to consider the tax implications of the business entity, e.g., LLC, S-Corp, FLP, she decides on. And what about those digital assets; do we need to consult with an IP colleague? However, what is equally important is her decision about what to do with the business at her death. This decision will weigh heavily on her attorney’s counsel about choosing fiduciaries. For example, will that person understand her business, can he or she successfully execute a buy/sell agreement, and can he or she manage winding up the business? Additionally, she wants to provide for both children equally. But giving half of the business’ financial interests to the daughter when the daughter has shown no interest may start a family feud between the siblings. Perhaps life insurance may help and may help in two ways. Once, the attorney ascertains the value of her business and, subsequently, her estate, life insurance can help lower the value of the estate for estate tax purposes and equalize the gifting between her two children. This example shows that smallbiz owners have a several critical decisions and options to make and consider at the start and near the end of their involvement with their businesses. Also, because the decisions made in the beginning can significantly affect the options with respect to succession planning, new smallbiz owners should seek to create a business plan that isn’t a stand-alone plan, but one that also encompasses estate planning. Ms. or Mr. Smallbiz & Family is just one of the faces of today’s family and the multiple faces and overlaps of today’s family shows why estate planning isn’t a “basic” area.
6 Not-so-Legal Ways to Protect Your Family
It seems there\’s a week, day, or month to celebrate every relationship and, accordingly, the third week in October has been designated \”National Estate Planning Week.\” Why we, estate planners, have a week dedicated to our practice area may, at first glance, seem self-aggrandizing. Yet, estate planning isn’t about lawyers but estate planning is about how individuals can protect their loved ones. Lawyers and other professionals simply guide the way. So instead of calling this week “National Estate Planning Week” maybe we should call it “National Family Fortification Week,” hmmm… Then again, I was going to suggest “National Family Planning Week” but that, too, could have been very misleading. Well, as they say, “a rose by any other name…” Throughout The Lotus Rules (fka the Shark Free Zone) are pieces explaining why estate planning is for everyone and not only the 1 percenters, discussions on basic estate planning documents, analyses on historical and pending cases and legislation involving relationship rights, and scary stories about car crashes and funeral home terrorists. However, I think this is the first post on point for fortifying your family, so welcome. Take simple steps early. If you’re a working young adult with loved ones, then you need a plan to keep potential serious illness or untimely demise from causing your loved ones even more grief. Your plan could be as simple as Powers of Attorney and life, health, and disability insurances. Tell your loved ones that they are indeed loved: “Mom, I won’t let you mortgage the house to pay for my medical bills and, here’s the agent information for all of my insurances.” Tears will probably flow but they\’ll be happy, proud tears. Teach your children the important lessons about life and money early, e.g., age 6, exemplify for them that living a happy and productive life is the goal and money is one tool that can help them reach that goal. Tailor your goals for you and your family; you\’re unique. An estate plan isn’t a goal; it’s another tool. Still, some wrenches are better than others. The same thing applies with respect to estate plans. A good estate plan just doesn’t involve obtaining life insurance, throwing funds in a retirement account, and creating a will. Those are good steps, but before taking those steps consider who will be your trusted advisors. Who\’ll take the time to get to know you and your family, work the plan, helping guide you and your family along over the next few decades? Take your time. OK, so you didn’t start out when you should have and you haven’t taken any steps yet, but holy crap, someone very close to you just passed away and surviving are kids, a dog, a spouse and…you want to do something NOW! Don’t. Well, don’t make any rash decisions, interview a few attorneys, talk to a few friends, chat with a few financial planners, and after the pain of losing a loved one has lessened, then start building your team. It will likely save you tons of resources down the road. Trust your team. Because of the attorney-client privilege issue, loved ones are not typically part of the initial consultation, but sometimes, if they\’re the cornerstone of the family or if a family business is involved, perhaps they should be. Make the initial meeting a \”let\’s get acquainted\” team meeting loved ones and professional advisors can give each other the \”sniff test.\” Discuss the broad strokes: wanting to ensure that the family is protected, that everyone knows who the “team” is, and create a comfortable, collaborative environment. Then later you can meet or speak with the attorney one-on-one regarding specifics. Estate planning is a technical practice with many complex moving parts, but some fundamentals have nothing to do with instruments and everything to do with being a loving family member.
4 Occasions When a Will Won\’t Work
Recently, law students received the following hypothetical to answer: “Ms. Angel Booth has phoned you, Ms./Mr. Associate, and said, “Hi, this is Angel Booth and I want to set up a will because I want to completely disinherit my daughter.” What is your response?” After getting rid of the “deer-in-headlights” look, the students came up with a myriad of answers. Yet and unfortunately, this isn’t an uncommon scenario and for valid reasons. Furthermore, this occurs not just between parents and children, but between as many relationship pairings as you can think of. Still, this scenario goes to reason number 1. Using a will is a tenuous proposition at best if you’re trying to disinherit an heir. Admittedly, I’m being a tad hyperbolic, because it can work – after a lengthy court battle involving lawyers, doctors, and a ton o\’ family members. To disinherit an immediate heir, in Illinois, using a standalone will where the value of the estate is more than $100,000 in personal or real property will beg for a contest and bye-bye goes a large portion of the estate – in probate litigation. Mamma Mega Millions Marries Gorgeous. Yes, you’ve been smitten by the most gorgeous, decades younger, individual walking the planet. You’ve worked your petooty off as a single mother, put your children and your siblings through university, and now want to enjoy the million-dollar fruits of your labor with Gorgeous in the bounds of matrimony. You will probably be advised to have an airtight prenuptial agreement. You also want a will prepared, but a will that leaves most of those millions to Gorgeous will shout, “Probate Litigation!” and siblings, children, BFFs, third cousins, you name it will probably shout back with claims against the estate. Grandpa Disses Daughter-in-Law. So, while it can’t be proven that she murdered your dearly departed son, you, Grandpa, just don’t agree on anything with your daughter-in-law about your grandchildren. In your opinion, she isn’t parenting the way your loving son would have. Still, you’ve saved about $30,000 that you want the children, ages 7 and 8 to have upon your death. I previously wrote about the imprudence of leaving substantial financial gifts outright to minors. This is another example. In Illinois, if a minor receives a substantive gift, e.g., more than $10,000, the funds must be transferred into a restricted vehicle for the minor whereby the guardian or custodian is given control. Typically, the guardian or custodian is an adult member of the minor’s family, i.e., Dastardly Daughter-in-Law or a trust company. Thirty-thousand dollars isn’t usually sufficient for a trust company; thus, DDIL will likely gain control over the $30,000. Calling Dr. Cooper. Finally, setting aside seedy scenarios, let’s consider Dr. Amy Cooper. She has a thriving practice with three other doctors and has started accumulating a substantive portfolio. She doesn’t mind paying her fair share of taxes, but doesn’t want her beneficiaries to pay more than their fair share either. Leaving everything outright to her partner and children in a will, however, results in the very thing she doesn’t want.