The Illinois 10-Step Probate Program
[vc_row type=\”in_container\” full_screen_row_position=\”middle\” column_margin=\”default\” column_direction=\”default\” column_direction_tablet=\”default\” column_direction_phone=\”default\” scene_position=\”center\” text_color=\”dark\” text_align=\”left\” row_border_radius=\”none\” row_border_radius_applies=\”bg\” overflow=\”visible\” overlay_strength=\”0.3\” gradient_direction=\”left_to_right\” shape_divider_position=\”bottom\” bg_image_animation=\”none\”][vc_column column_padding=\”no-extra-padding\” column_padding_tablet=\”inherit\” column_padding_phone=\”inherit\” column_padding_position=\”all\” column_element_direction_desktop=\”default\” column_element_spacing=\”default\” desktop_text_alignment=\”default\” tablet_text_alignment=\”default\” phone_text_alignment=\”default\” background_color_opacity=\”1\” background_hover_color_opacity=\”1\” column_backdrop_filter=\”none\” column_shadow=\”none\” column_border_radius=\”none\” column_link_target=\”_self\” column_position=\”default\” gradient_direction=\”left_to_right\” overlay_strength=\”0.3\” width=\”1/1\” tablet_width_inherit=\”default\” animation_type=\”default\” bg_image_animation=\”none\” border_type=\”simple\” column_border_width=\”none\” column_border_style=\”solid\”][vc_column_text text_direction=\”default\”]In Illinois, if a loved one passes away without a will or a trust in place, he or she has died “intestate.” Depending on the size and assets of the estate, probate may or may not be needed. Probate is a court proceeding where the judge appoints an “administrator” to the estate. If a will did exist and was appropriately filed, then the judge would probably appoint the will’s “executor.” The only difference between an administrator and an executor is that one is appointed intestate and the other is designated by a will. The administrator is responsible for paying all just debts and taxes, responding to claims on the estate, and concluding the final affairs of the deceased that includes distributing the assets of the estate. Sounds simple, right? Well, in today’s world, probate can be anything but simple. And unlike New Jersey, where it’s quick and cheap, in Illinois probate is long and costly. For example, the first thing one has to do is to get into court, which requires completing a petition that nominates one person as the administrator. What if Jack’s evil twin, Jill, wants to b administrator, too? Hopefully, Jill knows the slayer statute would keep her from collecting if Jack were to meet an untimely demise. The next to do is provide a list of all the heirs to the judge and prove – with birth and death certificates, and divorce decrees – where the heirship line has been broken. What if Thelma’s mom had 2 husbands and 2 children, Thelma and Louise, but Thelma could only find one set of divorce papers – the set involving the divorce from Louise’s father? And that’s all she’s going to find because Thelma’s mom and her dad were in a common law marriage in Kansas before she moved to Illinois. Let’s say the heir hurdles have been successfully jumped and you’ve been named administrator of grandma’s estate. Next we must notify any heirs and creditors, whether known or unknown, that the estate has been opened. What if Grandma forgot to mention that she borrowed $10000 from Uncle Charlie last Christmas to pay for everyone’s gifts and Uncle Charlie accepted a promissory note with the house as collateral? What if there’s no house but you find that Grandma had 12 different accounts in 12 different financial institutions totaling more than $100,000? Get the petition ready and btw – Illinois does not allow pro se appearances in probate. It is because our families are different, mobile, and complex that trusts are often recommended for individuals in Illinois. However, so we have it on record, the following are steps for opening probate in Illinois: Petition the court Notify eligible potential administrators and obtain consent or waivers from them Pay an oath and bond on the estate\’s personal property Prove heirship Appear in court and receive letters of office Notify known and unknown heirs and creditors Take an inventory of the estate assets File the inventory with surety company and heirs’ fiduciaries, e.g., guardians or conservators Respond to creditor claims Distribute assets after 6 month creditor claim period has ended The entire process from opening to closing probate can take anywhere from 9-14 months and perhaps why the steps involved in establishing a trust should be considered the \”probate-anonymous\” program. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Infants, Stairwells & Burning a Million Dollars
Wealth preservation aka “asset protection” is slowly rising to the top of the mainstream American lexicon, much like estate planning did a couple of decades ago. However, though related, the 2 activities are quite different. A solid estate plan’s end goal is to ensure that your intended beneficiaries obtain what you intend for them in the most efficient and least adverse manner possible. Retirement and tax planning are a substantial part of the estate planning process but the primary beneficiary at the end of the game is someone else, not you. Conversely, a solid wealth preservation plan will ensure that you don’t go broke before, during, or after retirement and fulfill your intentions toward your beneficiaries, tying it into estate planning. But the primary beneficiary of wealth preservation is not someone else; the primary beneficiary is you. Estate planning and wealth preservation are technically linked because the core documents and the fiduciary roles are primarily the same. Both include trusts and, consequently, trustees. Both might even include a LLC. The fundamental distinction is jurisdictional, i.e., what law governs the trust. Typically the laws in states that have asset protection statutes and are referred to as Domestic Asset Protection Trusts (DAPTs) govern wealth preservation instruments whose jurisdiction is in the U.S. Instruments whose jurisdiction is outside the U.S. are governed by the laws, or lack thereof, in those particular countries and are known as “offshore” trusts. Now before you start getting all antsy with thoughts of tax evasion, let me squash that thought like a bug. The only way to ensure that one doesn’t incur Uncle Sam’s penalties is by being completely compliant with the U.S. tax code. Now before going too far into the different schools of thought surrounding DAPTs and offshore trusts, you may be thinking, “I don’t have a gazillion dollars, so this doesn’t apply to me.” But before I lose you to Facebook or an incoming text message – wait. If you live in America, you live in one of the most lawsuit crazed countries in the world. So while you may not have a gazillion dollars, consider the following stats: 99% of doctors in high risk specialties will be sued; 75% of doctors in low-risk practice areas will be sued; Every 6 minutes a child under the age of 5 is treated for an injury sustained on a residential stairwell; In 2012, a woman was awarded about $833,000 for an injury sustained on her landlord\’s property ; Over a 10-year period, 15-21 lawsuits were filed per 100 architect firms; I won’t mention lawyers, it’s a given, people hate us, think we have deep pockets, so they sue us. So if you know your liability insurance won’t cover a potential lawsuit or the cost of litigation in successfully defending an unscrupulous claimant, how comfortable are you holding a “fire sale”? If you’re not thrilled about selling your home and liquidating all of your assets, including your retirement portfolio, to settle a claim, then wealth preservation may be needed sooner rather than later. Then again, maybe you have a million dollars to burn…
The 5-Letter Word\’s Evil Twin
I often comment fervently about trusts, as any good estate planning attorney would, that is, talk a lot…about trusts. So, yes, if someone asks me how best to plan for their family and I learn that they have more than $100,000 in assets or that they’ve got other family members with bones to pick, I spell out the word T-R-U-S-T in as many ways as possible. “However folk,” in the words within a great Sinatra monologue, a trust just ain’t the answer to all of life’s woes. A few “folk” can tell you why: Tammy Lewis is being sued for $50,000. She owns a piece of property with her sister. The property value is $100,000. A revocable living trust came to Tammy’s mind when she found out about the judgment. And the thought should have made like the rabbit in the black hat and disappeared. Whether the property is held in joint tenancy or tenancy in common, Tammy’s interest in the property is attachable by a creditor. If held in a revocable living trust, the trust assets are still considered owned by the grantor (which could be Tammy), so there is no creditor or judgment protection for Tammy. Sean Davidson and his wife were happily married for 15 years. His wife worked for 9 years and then took time off to give birth, nourish and nurture the kids, volunteer with the PTA, and so forth. Initially, she worked a little from home but not much, ultimately deciding that being a full-time wife and mother at least until the youngest was in first grade was important. However, when Ms. Davidson worked, she and Sean contributed equal amounts financially to buy and help pay the mortgage on the $600,000 family residence. Now, Sean wants a divorce. He contacted an attorney to place the house held in joint tenancy with the soon to be former Ms. Davidson in a trust for Sean and Sean alone. The flow of this particular scenario would work something like this: House + Sean Davidson Revocable Living Trust + Divorce = Wife Awarded 50% of Marital Property (incl. part of the house) = Invalid Trust = Sean Sues Lawyer = Lawyer Pays and Is Possibly Disciplined Of course, other avenues exist to address some of these issues but the main point is if you owe a debt, you can’t hide from it with a trust. It’s called F-R-A-U-D. The names of individuals found within this blog are purely fictional, unless otherwise expressly stated.
Don\’t Let JT Defeat Your Purpose
A piece I wrote a little while ago described the 3 tenancies of property ownership: Tenants in Common, Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship, and Tenancy by the Entirety. Occasionally, individuals of modest means will ask me about adding a non-spouse family member as a joint tenant to a bank account or to the title of their home. Typically, the individual is elderly, recognizing his or her mortality, or failing health. I applaud their queries because ensuring your financial affairs and making sure that funds are available to address illness or incapacity are in order as the golden years approach is critical. Yet, I caution against using joint tenancy with non-spouses* for the following reasons: Creditors. While the original owner’s credit may be stellar, the son, daughter, or niece may have outstanding debts. Joint tenancy allows creditors to attach liens to the property, thus defeating the purpose of having one’s financial affairs in order or being able to at least financially provide for one’s self in the event of illness or infirmity. Potential Probate. Just because property is in joint tenancy, at least in Illinois, doesn’t mean that probate is automatically avoided. If a gift wasn’t the rationale but a matter of convenience, as mentioned above was the premise and a will is in place, then per Illinois law, the property could have to pass through probate. Taxes. Unless the joint tenancy is between spouses, estate gift taxes may be triggered. Upon one tenant’s death, the estate tax is determined by the amount of contribution by the surviving tenant. If the surviving non-spouse tenant didn’t contribute to paying for the property, then the entire amount of the property is included in the decedent’s gross estate for estate tax purposes. So, we should think again about entering into joint tenancy agreements with non-spouse members, especially if any of the 3 reasons above may loom overhead. *If the surviving tenant is a spouse, then only half of the value of the property is included in the deceased spouse’s estate, reducing potential estate taxes by 50%.
3 Lessons from Summer Disaster Flicks
One hallmark of summertime in the U.S. is the onslaught of disaster movies. For me, there’s nothing like a great “the-world-is-under-attack-so-blow-‘em-up-real-good!” movie. So when temperatures crept into the 80s and trailers for “world under attack” started showing on TV, I couldn’t help but think about the “disaster” provisions in estate planning documents, aka “contingent beneficiary” provisions. Also, while reading a couple of cases and thinking about questions frequently asked by clients, I knew I had a winning screenplay, or a half-way decent blog post. So grab your popcorn and enjoy the move…I mean post. Ornery old Great-Grandma Cornelia Stamper decides to write her will and leaves one of her oil wells to her son, Harry. She names it “Harry Stamper’s Well.” Before she dies, though, Harry marries Anna and he and Anna have a daughter, Grace. Cornelia isn’t so keen on Anna, so she draws up a trust leaving income from the “Family Stamper’s Well” to Harry for his life and upon Harry’s death, the income from the well should be distributed equally among Cornelia’s heirs. Cornelia dies at the grand old age of 98 and Harry then draws up a trust leaving Harry Stamper’s Well to Grace and continues his life’s work – drilling in Alaska. Suddenly one day, Harry learns from his buddies at NASA that an asteroid is headed for Earth. Harry then changes his trust and adds a charitable contribution provision, giving part of the income from Family Stamper’s Well to the Red Cross and Medicins Sans Fronteirs and the rest to his descendants. Also, Grace has a trust created and leaves the income from Family Stamper’s Well to the same 2 charities. Fortunately, Harry’s NASA buddies blow the asteroid up real good and none of the particles cause any damage to Earth. A year later, while drilling near Russia, Harry is told that aliens attacked Earth and wiped out all his relatives including, Grace. Harry’s heart can’t take it and he dies. However, Grace actually escaped the attack but is the only Stamper left. Grace’s friends, David and Steven, however, blow up the alien ship real good and things return to normal – kinda. Half the world’s population is gone, so the Red Cross and Medicins Sans Frontiers have a lot of work to do. They are counting on Harry’s gift and know that the funds are available because the banks were saved. Go figure. Accordingly, they hire a lawyer; lots of us survived. But their meeting with the lawyer didn’t go well. My clients know why because these were their questions: 1. Can income from a life estate be given away by the owner of the life estate? In other words, could Harry bequeath income from Family Stamper’s Well? No. Cornelia left the income to Harry for his life only and then to Cornelia’s heirs. So unless Grace is feeling charitable during her lifetime, the nonprofits are out of luck until Grace dies. 2. What would have happened if Grace died in the alien attack but Family Stamper’s Well had dried up? In other words, what happens when the “gift” is no longer in the estate? If Grace knew the well was drying up and didn’t change her trust to provide for this event, then the gift would be considered “revoked,” or \”adeemed\” in legalese, and the charities out of luck. If Grace didn’t know and say the well was destroyed by the aliens, then the gift is still considered revoked unless she provided in the trust that the loss should be covered by insurance. 3. What would have happened if Grace died and she didn’t name anyone to take the income? That’s the real disaster. With all of the Stamper beneficiaries dead and no charity named, the income and well would probably go to the remaining population – bankers and lawyers.
2 Lessons from a Single Mom Held Hostage
One of the most important steps a single parent can take to protect his or her child is to plan for the unexpected. I don’t point it out often, but the fact is that one of the primary services offered by the Law Offices of Max Elliott is helping people plan for the day they die. Nobody likes to think about this, let alone talk about it, especially parents – moms and dads. Given that challenge, consider the following true story (with identifying characteristics changed): Molly and Sheldon had been dating for a couple of years but weren’t ready to get married. Sheldon was a struggling actor and Molly was fresh out of college. However, circumstance resulted in Molly having Sheldon’s little girl, Amy. Sheldon and Molly decided against marriage or entering into a Civil Union but both loved Amy dearly. One day while returning from work, Molly was killed in a car crash. Fortunately, she had life insurance. BUT… 1. She listed Amy as the primary beneficiary with no further instruction. 2. She listed Sheldon as the contingent beneficiary with no further instruction. 3. She didn’t tell her only other remaining “next of kin” about her “final wishes.” So… Molly’s body was sent to a funeral home selected by her only remaining next of kin, who could not afford to pay for the funeral services but, when meeting with the funeral home director and Sheldon, mentioned the life insurance policy. The funeral home agreed to perform the services that week only if they could be guaranteed payment through the insurance proceeds. For this to occur to the satisfaction of the funeral home, Sheldon, who was on Amy’s birth certificate, would still have to go to court and agree to open an estate for Amy and a lawyer, referred to Sheldon by the funeral home, would have to be named trustee. The bottom line: If Sheldon didn’t want to take the funeral home up on its offer, during one of the most challenging times of a person’s life, I might add, he had to find the money elsewhere within 24 hours. Taking the funeral home’s offer meant: Retaining an attorney that neither he nor Molly knew to represent their little girl. Designating an attorney neither he nor Molly knew to be trustee for their little girl’s sizable estate at least temporarily; and here’s the other burn… Paying thousands of dollars of little Amy’s money to an attorney and a funeral home in order to hold Molly’s services within a reasonable time. This is a grim, real life story but I implore you to take and pay forward the critical lessons: DO NOT designate minors as primary beneficiaries of life insurance policies, retirement accounts, and the like. DO communicate to your loved ones your final wishes, so you and your loved ones won’t be held hostage.
A Fiduciary\’s Lesson on IRS Pre-emption
On April 11, 2012, the Second District Appellate Court of Illinois filed an Opinion emphasizing the importance of a fiduciary’s role in trust and estate planning. As a fiduciary, an executor or trustee typically has the responsibility to ensure items such as the estate’s value and the relevant taxes are calculated correctly and, subsequently, paid. Accordingly, it is important for individuals to select appropriate fiduciaries. It is equally important for those approached to be fiduciaries to understand the scope of duties involved and the consequences if those duties are not performed properly. Case on point: People of Illinois v. Kole, No. 09-L-892. The Lay of the Land In 1993, Anthony F. Crespo named Julius Kole as executor and successor trustee of the Anthony F. Crespo Living Trust. Crespo died in 2002 and Kole paid $127,000 in Illinois estate taxes. Kole also filed a request for an extension to file the Illinois estate tax return, which was granted. Six months later, he filed the Illinois return reporting an approximate $81,000 estate tax liability. The Illinois Attorney General’s office received the return and issued a “Certificate of Discharge and Determination of Tax,” stating that, based on the information provided, the estate taxes were fully paid and, therefore, the estate was clear of any liens from the State. The Certificate of Discharge also relieved Kole from any personal estate tax liability for the Crespo estate. However, an IRS audit of the federal estate tax return reported in 2006 a revised value of the estate, increasing the value from more than $2.1M to $4.4M. This, of course, increased the Illinois state tax liability. Consequently, Illinois sued Kole, personally, seeking the additional estate tax owed plus penalties and interest, amounting to more than $300,000. The Arguments Kole first argued that the plain language of the Certificate of Discharge had relieved him of the obligation to pay additional taxes. The State replied that the Certificate of Discharge was routinely issued upon initial filings, which were based on the information provided at the time. So the initial issuance did not negate the need for supplemental filings if new information resulted in additional taxes owed. Kole’s response to the State, however, was enough to cause this reader to question her eyesight: “[Kole] admitted that the estate never paid any additional tax to Illinois or filed a supplemental return, but he then objected on hearsay grounds to the contents of the IRS Report.” Commentary and Conclusion To use the common vernacular, “Hearsay? Really?” Kole’s argument about the Certificate of Discharge’s plain language meaning at least had some merit, but arguing that an IRS Audit Report is hearsay was quite colorable. Even non-lawyers have watched enough Law & Order to learn the public records and business records hearsay exceptions. The trial court, however, agreed with Kole’s plain language argument. The Illinois AG appealed and the Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision (see Lesson #2, infra). Lessons Choose a fiduciary who will obtain a correct valuation and pay the appropriate taxes due – whenever they\’re due; A Certificate of Discharge isn\’t really final until the IRS says so; and Take great care in accepting a fiduciary role.
Debunking Estate Planning Myths & Developing Wealth, Pt 4
To navigate around and through some of the disadvantages to basic estate planning I talked about previously and to provide a client and his or her family with more protection, estate planners typically use intermediate tools and techniques. The most basic intermediate tool is a trust, but before getting too far ahead, let me point out the difference between a land trust and a living trust. Illinois is one of a handful of states that allows a party to place primary residential property in a land trust. An Illinois Land Trust is an agreement entered into by the owner of a property and an institutional trustee. The trustee becomes the legal and equitable owner of the property and the former owner, becomes the owner of a beneficial interest in the property. The property essence also changes from real property to personal property for the sake of this agreement, which means the property is easier to dispose of. So, if a person is aging and has relatively few assets, say less than $50,000, a land trust may be a viable option for avoiding probate. However, if the person has other significant assets or is younger and will be accumulating more assets, it is probably more advisable for that person to gift the property to their spouse or other beneficiaries using a revocable living trust. The reason for this is that a land trust can only hold primary residential property; while a revocable living trust can hold almost anything that is allocated to it. Therefore, if a person owns a home, has retirement proceeds, and investment accounts, those can be assembled under one umbrella revocable living trust, but not so for a land trust. Often, the creator (aka \”grantor\” or \”settlor\”) of the trust is also the trustee and trust beneficiary and can, like a land trust, make changes to the trust during his or her lifetime, ergo, \”revocable.\” All revocable trusts become irrevocable on the creator\’s death. Individuals typically place property in a land trust to avoid creditors or probate. Avoiding probate is a valid reason; however, MYTH BUSTER: creditors can typically reach into a land trust with the appropriate court order and have a judgment lien placed on the property. As mentioned, revocable living trusts allow individuals to place more than land into a trust for their beneficiaries. Placing assets in a valid revocable or irrevocable trust, also similar to a land trust, prevents beneficiaries from going to probate court and keeps the terms of the estate distribution private. However, unlike a land trust, real property in a revocable or irrevocable trust retains its essence as real property and the owner, as trustee, retains legal and equitable ownership. Not only do revocable and irrevocable trusts save beneficiaries the time and money required to open a probate estate, but trusts may also provides estate tax and income tax minimization for beneficiaries and sometimes for grantors, which isn\’t the case with land trusts. Part 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Debunking Estate Planning Myths & Developing Wealth, Pt 3
In Part 2 of this series, I continued discussing the basic estate planning tools, and addressed life insurance. Another basic tool and necessity that should be in place for loved ones upon your transition is a will. The Shark Free Zone talked about this topic before, but it is so critical that it bears repeating. Having a will in place if you are an unmarried parent or a guardian of a disabled individual – minor or adult – is vital. If you do not have a will in place that designates a guardian for your child and you die, the state, not your brother or your cousin who you told to take care of your child, will decide on the custody of your dependent. The judge will not care about what you said to your brother, all that will matter is what was in the will. If a will is nonexistent, then what will matter is biological parentage. By having a valid will in place with a guardianship provision, you can make a bona fide argument to the court about who should care for your child or dependent when you pass, not the other way around. Let’s look at an example: Bobbi Tina is the minor child of Wilma Dallas and Bobby Black who have been divorced let’s say since before Bobbi Tina’s first birthday. For the sake of this example, let’s say that Bobby Black has substance abuse problems and hasn’t developed any type of relationship, father-daughter bond with Bobbi Tina. Let’s also say that Wilma lived in Illinois and did not designate a guardian for Bobbi Tina.Wilma dies in a swimming pool accident, leaving her fortune to Bobbi, who is only 16 years old. Guess who the courts will likely deem appropriate as a guardian for Bobbi Tina, as long as he’s not a felon? Yep, the hypothetical, substance-abusing, absent father, Bobby Black will be designated guardian and have liberal access to Bobbi Tina’s million dollar money jar. It’s happened before where a mother died intestate and she and the child had been estranged for years from the biological father, but just because there was no will and then no guidance in the will, the child was given to the estranged biological father. Consequently, a will is critical for parents or individuals taking care of the disabled. So answer this question: Who will take care of my child/children/disabled sibling/ if something happened to me tomorrow? A will is also important for individuals in high-risk professions who are more likely to become parties to law suits than other professionals. Why? Because the creditor claim period is only 6 months. Therefore, after the probate estate is open, individuals or entities with a claim against the estate only have 6 months to make that claim. Once the 6 months is over, creditors cannot bring a claim against the estate, despite how large or how valid the claim may be. Their hands just won’t fit the money jar. Finally, like life insurance, another advantage of a will is the peace of mind it brings knowing your loved ones are protected. Part 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
One Man\’s Treasure…May Need a Trust
The rumour mill in estate planning circles has me and my colleagues wondering, worrying, and scurrying like little fuzzy hamsters on a wheel or those guinea pigs in that commercial, “Row! Row! Row!” Why? Because this is probably the last year where the federal lifetime estate tax exemption, which is currently at $5.12M with a marginal tax rate of 35%, will be available for gifting. If Congress doesn’t act by December 31 of this year, the exemption will fall to $1M with a marginal tax rate of 55%. That means that the $5.12M you might be able to leave to children and grandchildren free of estate taxes today will be reduced to $2.26M on January 1 of next year. And the rumour that has us planners running and rowing is that Congress isn’t going to do anything until after the election, not until perhaps the beginning of next year. Now I’ve written (and tweeted) at length about how one’s estate can reach the $1M mark quickly, even if you don’t think you’re rich. So I’m going to talk about another aspect related to waiting until it’s too late: your trash or treasure. Many parents and grandparents and maybe even you collect “stuff.” Some of this “stuff” is truly items only they or you could love. However, some of this stuff is truly treasure that Christie’s, Sotheby’s, or your friendly neighborhood estate sale groupie who knows her Mikimotos or who has followed the first edition market since his childhood could love. So if you receive something from dearly departed Grandpa that isn’t warming your heart, before putting a “For Sale” sign on it, get it appraised first; a quick Google search might do the trick. Equally and maybe more importantly, if you have or a loved one is considering giving you something from a collection that is near and dear, such as vintage cameras from the 40s and 50s, sterling filigree jewelry from the 30s, an English buffet server from the 19th century, or a bar stool from Studio 54, you might consider having it appraised and placing in a trust or suggesting that they place it in trust this year. Otherwise, if that Erte design collection from the roaring twenties isn’t placed in trust and your grandma passes away, those beautiful designs may be on the lawn to pay the estate tax bill “Nana” left you along with the rest of her stuff.