Jennifer\’s Story – A Fiduciary\’s Tale, Part 3
If you’ve been following Jen’s story, you know that Bill’s, her father, condition was made worse by secondary emergency procedures instituted upon Alex’s, Jen’s brother, instructions to the ER doctors. This was an emergency; Jen was 30 minutes away; and the records were 10 minutes from being received by the ER. When the records arrived, it was clear from all of the advanced directives that Alex was not considered a fiduciary or personal representative. He was not to be given any information whatsoever. And as mentioned in the previous article, the information needed to prevent the complication that Bill suffered arrived 10 minutes after Alex had given the doctors the green light. In this case, because there was no third back-up to Jen and no way to contact her, the secondary steps taken could not have been avoided. The doctors proceeded with their hospital’s policy and that may not have been avoided even if Alex said he wasn’t a fiduciary. In emergencies, the difference between life and death can be seconds sometimes. So if Bill doesn’t fully recover or recover at all, the ultimate responsibility for his disability or death will likely sit with Bill for not naming a third back-up. The guilt will, however, rest heavily on Jen and possibly Alex. However, the doctor who spoke with Alex isn’t completely exonerated. Once the doctor saw who was designated on the advanced directives, which included the HIPAA forms, to receive Bill and Carla’s personal health information, the doctor should not have had any further conversation about Bill’s condition with Alex. Nevertheless, he continued speaking with Alex and sharing Bill’s medical history, contrary to law. Privacy provisions under HIPAA prohibit sharing personal health information with anyone, even next of kin, unless the person is designated as a personal representative on the form. Needless to say, Jen became even more distraught when she spoke with her attorney. Now, Alex has faded into the ER waiting room background and Jen is visiting with Carla, whose condition has improved to stable. Jen can’t tell Carla about Bill though and is contemplating the worst case scenario for Bill. Still, as Jen sits quietly while Carla sleeps, Jen reviews one document that provides a sliver of peace of mind at least for her parents, though the doctors probably won’t understand. But they don’t have to; families have their own overall personalities as these doctors will find out and the law is the law. More to come… Jen\’s Story – A Fiduciary\’s Tale, Part 1 | 2 | 3
The Issue of Issue, Deers, and ART
A couple of days ago, I read an article on alternative reproductive technology, “ART,” and posthumously born children. It reminded me of conversations and cases about heirs that I’d also recently encountered. The article, conversations, and readings affirmed for me that the question of who is an “heir” or “issue,” while initially may seem simple to answer, can be complex. Thirty years ago, the definition of “child” found in a will or trust may have been a few sentences. Today, that definition is – or should be – a few paragraphs. Consider the following: Jeremy and Jessica were in a loving, committed, cohabiting relationship for more than 10 years and were unmarried because they refused to institutionalize their relationship. Still they wanted to have a baby, but Jay was sterile. However, Jeremy’s best friend, Keith, agreed to b a sperm donor. Eventually, they found a clinic that would perform the procedure and Keith was asked to sign a consent form. One statement on the form provided that Keith waived all rights of parentage with respect to the child that would be born to Jeremy and Jessica using Keith’s sperm. He was to check that box if he agreed with this statement. Keith thought about his significant other, Karen. He and Karen were also in a long-term relationship and discussed marriage and children a few months ago. But no definitive plans were made. Keith was in his early 40s and very successful; if he and Karen didn’t work out, he reasoned that this could be his only chance at quasi-parenthood. He decided not to check the box and think about it more but he signed the form. Jessica underwent the procedure the day Keith signed the form. Then, the 3 left the clinic; Keith headed home to Karen. Unfortunately Keith never arrived home. He was killed when a deer darted out in front of his car and Keith swerved onto a patch of ice, careening him and his car into an oncoming semi-tractor trailer. Karen was more than distraught because she was going to tell Keith about the bundle of joy that was produced when she and Keith had far too much to drink a couple of months ago. Keith died without a will, so who will eventually inherit his estate? Illinois law provides that posthumously born children are children of the decedent. Consequently, if both ladies were successful giving birth, then both children would have been Keith\’s heirs. This also illustrates the importance of another provision now becoming a standard in wills and trusts – the genetic reproductive material provision. If Jessica chose to store Keith’s sperm until a day she was more fertile and Keith died before that day with a will that had a genetic reproductive material provision, then Jessica could have been precluded from using his sperm. Keith could have also changed the definition of children in his will to expressly disinherit any children born of ART except those born during the time he is in an intimate, cohabiting relationship with the mother of said child. Still, all this presupposes that Keith would not have wanted 2 daughters. The point? No one can predict who or what our family will be or look like, but when we make a decision about what part or all of that family may look like, we need to write it down in a legal instrument ASAP.
Crashes, Collapses & Conflagrations, Oh My!
Living in Chicago, the second largest legal community in the U.S., has its benefits: I meet great colleagues who have a wealth of information valuable not only to their clients but also to the general public. So occasionally, The Shark Free Zone will feature a colleague who is willing to share his or her insights. This week, I welcome friend and colleague, Stephen L. Hoffman, discussing injuries, accidents, and insurance to help us protect our loved ones and property… Many of us try to avoid planning for our future. Much as we defer creation of estate planning documents, we are also unprepared when it comes to some basic, everyday requirements such as what to do in the event of an accident. Each year in Illinois, nearly 500,000 auto collisions occur and over 100,000 work injuries or illnesses are sustained. Auto collisions, work accidents, and home fires occur. Odds are that you, a family member, or contact will be involved in one of those events at some point. Personally, I have experienced a fire in my condominium building and an automobile collision, all within the last 5 years. And I\’m careful, cautious, and none were my fault. If you fail to verify that you have adequate insurance coverage, your life could be altered permanently, with no opportunity to undo the damage. If you ARE involved in an accident, then you should be prepared to do or have available a few basic things: Have your automobile insurance information with you and exchange it with the other driver and police. Take photographs of the scene, while you are still there, if possible. Get photos of all vehicles and persons involved, the cause of your fall, any visible injuries, or debris. This preserves evidence. Get medical treatment immediately. Insurance companies WILL use any delay in treatment against you! Contact the police, fill out an incident report, or write about the accident in some way. DO NOT SPEAK to anyone about this. DO NOT give a statement to an insurance adjuster! Contact an attorney immediately. More cases go south early on than at any other point. With respect to insurance, consider the following: Whether you are a driver, owner of a home, or the owner of a business, make sure you understand what your insurance covers and that your coverage is adequate. Get the most coverage from the best-rated company you can afford. Check your liability limits on your car policy. If you have any assets and your limits are below $500,000.00, you probably need to reexamine them. All it takes is a moment of inattention by a driver, including you, who may be uninsured or grievously underinsured, to lose your house, savings, and well-being. If you have substantial assets, a personal liability umbrella policy is likely well within your reach financially, and definitely worthwhile. Know what your homeowner\’s policy provides for in certain events, e.g., a fire in an adjoining condo unit. Can you move into a temporary residence if yours is uninhabitable and for how long? What is the damages limit? Tidbits Auto Insurance Illinois is a mandatory auto insurance state. However, this means that many people only have the BARE MINIMUM in coverage. If YOUR coverage (Uninsured Motorist and Underinsured Motorist) is not robust, you could conceivably be involved in a collision that is not your fault, with virtually no coverage available. Condominium/Homeowner\’s Insurance If you live in a condo, make sure your governing documents require other unit owners to maintain insurance on their units. All it takes is one accidental fire in one unit or a leak that causes a ceiling collapse to leave you and the rest of the association liable. Workers\’ Compensation The Illinois Workers\’ Compensation Act provides for payment of medical benefits, lost wages, and permanency for those injured while performing their job functions. This includes injuries occurring outside of an office and while in transit to or from a job usually. Plan ahead and be ready for the inevitable! Stephen L. Hoffman is the founder of Law Office of Stephen L. Hoffman LLC, a Boutique Personal Injury and Workers\’ Compensation law firm located in Chicago. Stephen is now in his 23rd year of practice representing injured people and fighting for their rights with dignity. Contact Stephen by phone (773-944-9737) or email stephen@hofflawyer.com. Information about Stephen and ways to further access him are through his blog and website, LinkedIn, Twitter (@hofflaw), and AVVO.
Debunking Estate Planning Myths & Developing Wealth, Pt 2
As mentioned in Part 1 of this series, powers of attorney last until death, so they protect you and your loved ones now. The other tool that can protect your loved ones immediately upon death is life insurance. From a very basic perspective, life insurance is used to replace the income of a loved one. If you’re a single parent, I need not tell you how absolutely critical it is to have life insurance, because for single parents, life insurance can provide a lot more, which involves the intermediate techniques I will discuss in Part 3. However, before I continue, another myth needs debunking: Life insurance IS considered part of your estate for estate tax purposes. Most people think it is not but that is because typically life insurance proceeds aren’t considered taxable for income tax purposes. However, income taxes and estate taxes are two separate issues. So what does this mean? If you currently have or are close to having a taxable estate when considering the value of your home, retirement accounts, investment accounts, and other assets, then if you include a sizable life insurance policy with those assets, you will likely pass the taxable estate threshold. Right now, few individuals come close to having a taxable estate because the federal tax exemption is high right now – $5.12M, and the marginal tax rate is relatively low – 35%.* Additionally, Illinois, which is not linked (or “coupled”) with the federal tax system is also relatively high – $3.5M and our marginal tax rate is 16%.* Now, I’m going to save the bulk of what this means in terms of planning for the next blog entry, but know that if Congress doesn’t do anything by December 31 of this year, the federal exemption is going to be reduced to $1M and the tax rate increased to 55%. That means that if someone dies in 2013 with $1.8M or more in assets, their beneficiaries may likely face a federal tax bill on the $800,000 excess! Let’s look at this example: Single Parent Sheila owns a 6 flat that’s worth about $700,000, has about $250,000 in retirement benefits, and then has $500,000 worth of life insurance and, unfortunately dies next year, those life insurance proceeds and part of those retirement benefits will be needed to pay taxes if Congress or Sheila doesn’t do anything. Lesson: Parents should be careful when purchasing life insurance because life insurance is necessary but it is not always ignored by Uncle Sam. * 2013 update: The federal estate tax exemption is $5.25M indexed for inflation with a marginal rate of 40%; and the Illinois estate tax exemption is $4M. Part 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Take 5: Planning for Parents with Jazz
Today, I was listening to one of my mother’s favorite tunes, “Lake Shore Drive,” by the late Art Porter, Jr. Enjoying the fact that she so loves this great sax melody reminded me of a client who recently came into my office. As we talked I was struck again by the fact that if it were not for the sacrifices made by parents, many of us would not have the good fortunes that we have today. Occasionally, individuals who understand this honour the sentiment by taking it to the next level with action. So listening today, I decided I’d pay it forward by providing 5 pieces of information you should have as you plan for your parents. The difficult conversation should, of course, have taken place. After that, you should determine the following: What the estimated amount of need-based government benefits your parents will receive by the time your plan is scheduled to start providing for you or them. This amount will determine how much you can provide for them if their assets plus their benefits is insufficient. Who are their primary physician(s), life insurance agents, and other key contact persons. If you don’t know them already, schedule time to have a small chat with each of these persons and put them on notice that your loved ones are protected not only by their services and products but also by you. Where your parents want to live in the event one or both become infirm and unable to tend to each others\’ basic needs, e.g., proper hygiene, nutritional maintenance, and medical treatments. Most folks say “my home,” unlike my mother, who sent me a link to her favourite cruise line. What their retirement and estate plans entail and if these plans reflect their current family and financial statuses. CAUTION! Sometimes parents don’t provide equally for siblings. This isn’t a smart parental move irrespective of the motivation, but it happens. So if you’re getting pushback, this may be the reason and may be a good time to try to avert a potential family feud. The nuances of how they handle finances. This may change over time but generally people are consistent in the way they manage their personal finances. For example, some folks are uncomfortable with less than $200 in their wallet; some withdraw cash from the bank at the beginning of the week that’s to last them until the next week; and some older individuals go a few times a week just because it gets them moving and, if it’s a local community branch, they get to see familiar faces. If you plan to provide for your parents and discuss these matters now, all parties will be more comfortable and less stressed-out when the time comes for you to supplement or provide them with income. Even if you aren’t sure that you’ll be able to assist your parents, this information is still valuable in case they just need your help.* Just like us, our elders generally relish their independence, so to lose some or all of that freedom can be kinda earth-shattering. If a loved one could make a possibly traumatizing situation for you less stressful, wouldn’t you want them to take the necessary steps to do so? I would. So take 5, play a little Art Porter – or The Stones – and sit down and listen, so you can pay it forward in the right key, when the time comes. As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome… *As seen in Crain\’s Chicago Business.
Team Estrogen Needs to Plan Now for Now … and Then
For my male readers, I’m shouting one out for the estrogen team, today. You\’re more than welcomed to stay and share this post with the hub of your life, but I’ll return to the neutral zone with the next post. Recently, I shared a number of articles via Twitter and LinkedIn about the supposed trepidation women have when it comes to estate planning, particularly managing their financial affairs. As a female lawyer in a practice area traditionally held by men, I must admit those articles ruffled my feathers. I contend that women are not afraid of talking about money or estate planning matters, we often just don’t think we have the time. The role of the female is still that of the family hub– mother, daughter, spouse, partner, sister. Being the family hub requires a great deal of time and effort. Add to that our occupational responsibilities and community obligations and it’s perfectly understandable why we focus on the “now” and not the “then.” Yes, we are fully aware of the fact that if we take some time now, we could make “then” better. However, as a single parent when: a presentation to a major client is due on Monday, the kids have to be taken to gymnastics and birthday parties and Sunday school, Mom needs help with her new ottoman, Sis wants a review of the web site of your annual “sisterhood vacation” hotel, as chair of the silent auction committee you have to complete the donations list by Friday night, and you still have to exercise, cook, and pick up the cleaning (housekeeper not in the budget), “converting my 401(k) into …” doesn’t really make it to the top of the list. Next, is the fact that we know we’re the hub and the emotional gravity accompanying that realization. I don’t know too many women who readily give thought to when they won’t be around to see their grandchildren, nieces’ weddings, or best friend’s daughter’s college graduation. It is a very painful and counterintuitive thought for women. Fear has little to do with it. We simply love our families and friends and cannot fathom not being there for them. Nevertheless, Ladies, as painful, counterintuitive, and time consuming as it may be, we owe it to our families and ourselves to sacrifice a manicure, to miss a committee meeting, to reschedule a conference call, to say a prayer and let Sis choose the hotel, so we can take care of “now” and “then” now. The list of reasons for doing this is not exhaustive and are compelling: Your retirement savings may be dwindling unnecessarily; Your widowed father living a few states away may have a new BFF with less than charitable thoughts about Dad’s annuity; An in-state college may not afford your son the best educational opportunity for his mechanical engineering career; You might be able to withdraw income now from grandma’s IRA (progressive grandma!); Your current income may be beneficial for a retirement vehicle that may not be as readily available when your income rises past a certain point; You may want to go on sabbatical but, who’s going to mind the store, literally; Instead of a place where Mom will be bored silly playing checkers, you may want to send her cruising 6 months a year; and You want your partner to be able to visit you immediately after major surgery. Minding our retirement and estate matters now actually makes us, the family hub, stronger. If you want, I’ll take notes at your next committee meeting, so you can meet with a reputable CFP.