Navigating Florida\’s Perilous Spousal Estate Inheritance
Contributing Author: Nicole Page Florida law provides significant protection to surviving spouses who have been disinherited or left a small share by their deceased spouses. In Florida, a spouse cannot be disinherited by a will or a trust, which is different than Illinois, where a spouse can be disinherited by using a trust. Florida law gives spouses the option to choose to inherit what was left to them according to their deceased spouses will or the choice to elect to receive a percentage of the elective estate. A surviving spouse usually elects to take an elective share in situations where the deceased spouse attempts to disinherit them or leaves them less than they would receive if they took an elective share. The amount of the elective share is a case-by-case analysis, depending on the value of the estate. There is no fixed number, but rather a percentage – up to 30% of the deceased spouse’s estate. It’s also important to note that some assets that aren’t typically a part of an estate are considered to determine the surviving spouse’s elective share. This means that an attempt to circumvent the elective estate statute by distributing assets into a trust may still not be sufficient to disinherit a spouse. Florida does not discriminate by codifying what type of character the spouse had or the nature of the relationship between the spouses. This means that even if the spouses have been living separately for years, it does not infringe on the right to the elective share. As long as the spouse is a Florida resident and still married at the time of the death, they can claim the elective share. Barriers to claiming the elective share are: Executing a valid premarital or postmarital agreement. Required procedural protocols: The surviving spouse must file a written notice that they are invoking the elective share statute with the probate court within 6 months after the date of service of the notice of administration or 2 years after the date of the decedent’s death. Still, if you would prefer to provide for your children because you\’re in a second marriage, beware of what\’s lurking beneath…
A NY Roadmap for Intestate Estate Administration
Contributor: Gabby Wasenius Dealing with the loss of a loved one is never easy, and the legal process that follows can be daunting, especially if your loved one passes away intestate, i.e., without a Last Will and Testament (Will). In New York, when someone passes away without a will, their heirs must go to the Surrogate\’s Court to petition for something called \”Letters of Administration.\” These Letters grant a person, usually a close family member, the power to collect and distribute the deceased person\’s belongings. Before you can ask for Letters of Administration, you need to make sure there really is no Will. To do this, check with the Surrogate’s Court to see if a Will was filed for safekeeping, look through the deceased person\’s papers, and contact any lawyers they may have worked with. Once you are sure there is no will, you can petition the Court for Letters of Administration. Usually, the people who have the right to inherit the assets are the same people who can request to be the Administrator. The Administrator is the person who will be in charge of the estate and receive the Letters of Administration. However, not just any relative can become the Administrator. The Administrator has to be a close family member, an honest person who is not a convicted felon, bondable (someone who is insurable with decent credit), unlikely to face objections, and a U.S. citizen or a legal resident. The Court needs specific forms, details, and documents before they issue Letters of Administration. You will need an original death certificate, a paid funeral bill, and names and contact information for all potential distributees. A distributee is a person who will inherit without a Will. It is also important that you notify the Court of any special circumstances regarding the distributees (like if someone is in jail, a minor, or disabled) or if there are unknown distributees. All potential distributees must consent to the Letters of Administration and the potential Administrator or be officially notified. So, along with the petition, you must submit their agreement on a form called a Waiver. If they cannot or will not agree, you must provide a Citation for the court to issue. Additionally, any special circumstances of the distributees will require more forms and documentation and may require additional proceedings. Once the Court gives you Letters of Administration, you must collect the decedent\’s assets and belongings, pay off debts and taxes, and only then can you distribute what remains to the distributees according to New York law. While you can find the basic forms you need on the New York Office of Court Administration’s website, having an expert by your side is incredibly valuable as you deal with the complex world of New York’s Surrogate’s Court. Unexpected problems can cause delays in your request for Letters of Administration, and the points above are just the main points on the New York estate administration roadmap.
Zen and the Art of Sibling Rivalry
(Or more aptly titled, \”Probate War Stories That Will Scare You Into Estate Planning…I hope\”) My sister predeceased me. During our childhood, as the older sibling, I did what most older siblings did – tortured her because my parents tortured me. Okay. Torture is a misnomer, but childhood psychologists say that my actions seeking to control my younger sibling, were natural for the stage of our relationship. And in my evolving yet immature brain, it was only fair: There were only 2 of us, and I was the oldest. But it ended when I stayed small for my age and my younger sister grew large for her age, and she showed me who was really boss. After that, my sister and I rarely had a row. Maybe we had strong differences of opinions three times during the entire 46 years we were together. She was no saint (and neither was I), but there were lines we just didn’t cross. And maybe we were just lucky that way, or maybe I’m just dreaming because of the 4 in our tiny family, my sister was the first one to die. However, I would prefer to think that we were just lucky that way, like our cousins who were also sisters with parents who predeceased them. Because O-M-G… Siblings who will drain an estate dry because of control issues and parents who just knew the kids would get along fine. Death and money changes everything… Sibling POAs who absconded with the bulk of the fortune while a POA, leaving other siblings to wonder if the medical bills were that high. Pending death and money changes everything… Siblings who changed the Last Will and Testament in the hospital room, after the morphine drip increased and other siblings were taking care of the house. Like I said, pending death… Siblings who saw the Last Will and Testament before the other siblings, didn’t like what they saw, decided to keep the Will in a safe place, and upon death, when asked, “What will? There is no will.” Secret knowledge of disproportionate gifting changes everything… I recently listened to a panel of estate planning attorneys discuss the importance of transparency in gifting. I agree and disagree. Parents generally love their children and, before the parents die or become incapacitated, they rarely see the sibling ghoul that lurks within. So, being transparent about estate planning is an exercise in futility. However, disproportionate gifting, making only one a POA over financial matters, and the rationale behind these actions should be discussed with everyone in the room and…probably a Zen Master. Now, not all siblings are evil-doers. In my practice, I’ve witnessed wonderfully loving acts of generosity between siblings. But, the wars… Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō
Probate Horrors: Not All Fiction, Unfortunately
Probate is the court process generally required when a person with assets dies without a Last Will and Testament or some other testamentary mechanism in place that designates who should receive those assets. In Illinois, probate is lengthy – at least 14 months; costly – initial processing fees start at $850 and the average retainer is $2500; and assets are frozen for at least 6 months – so heirs cannot obtain their inheritance. So, in Illinois, unless there’s a possibility that an estate will face a protracted and costlier lawsuit, probate should be avoided. But sometimes, as much as we try, folks just don’t listen: The Other Heir Abe died without a Will, leaving his surviving spouse, Christine, and Brandy, the 3 year-old child borne of their marriage, as heirs. At the time of his death, Abe owned a small business, a home, and about $300,000 in a bank account. Christine was informed that because the bank account was the only asset with a designated beneficiary, the estate would require probate. Unbeknownst to Christine, Abe had another child, Donald, who he’d been supporting even before his marriage to Christine. Donald’s mother promised Abe that she would not confront Christine because the payments she received from Abe were 4 times as much as what she’d receive in child support. At the time of Abe’s death, Donald was 6 years of age. But then Abe died and so did all payments to Donald’s. At Abe’s death, his estate balance sheet and the probate distribution would resemble this: Estate AssetsHome, $250,000Business, $500,000Bank account, $300,000 (but this belonged to Christine)Total non-designated assets: $750,000 LiabilitiesBusiness creditors $250,000Tax Liabilities, $50,000Estate administration fees, $10,000Total Liabilities: $310,000 Distributions to HeirsChristine, 50%, $205,000Brandy, 25%, 102,500Donald, 25%, $102,500 Abe had always been concerned about Donald’s mother’s spending habits; so Abe paid many items, medical bills, clothing, and daycare directly on behalf of Donald. Now, because Donald was a minor and Abe did not plan for him in a Trust, Donald’s mother, the spendthrift, would likely be appointed Guardian of Donald’s estate with direct access to $102,500. Estate planning could have provided benefit for Donald, even without Christine and Brandy ever knowing. But… Abe didn’t plan. That DNA kit/Ancestry App Suppose that Donald was an adult and had just received results from a genealogical investigation, which illustrated that he and Abe were 99.9% son and father. He decides to search for Abe and learns that Abe just died. Christine refuses to meet with him; so Donald shows up in court… Hence, the reason why probate courts also have bailiffs. What if Donald was also a spendthrift or worse? Could he inherit?
New Laws Approaching Fast
Summer has ended for most families with children and we thought about this and other family dynamics in our most recent newsletter. However, the summer didn\’t stop Illinois Governor Pritzker from approving several laws that will affect families and businesses in the coming months. Here\’s a few that you may find interesting: The Illinois Trust Code, effective January 1, 2020, aligns Illinois with states that have adopted or established their own version of the Uniform Trust Code. Meaning for you: As you and your family move among the states, your estate plan may not need much revision. Assault or battery of an elderly person results in a loss of inheritance, effective January 1, 2020. Meaning for you: Nothing, we hope. Recreational cannabis will be legal in Illinois, effective January 1, 2020. Meaning for you: If you will partake or endeavor commercially, remember it is still against the law, federally, Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act, effective January 1, 2020. Meaning for you: If you inherit property with someone else as a co-tenant and y\’all can\’t get along, the property can be sold without mutual agreement. Department of Public Health Powers and Duties Law amended to allow a feasibility study for a state repository for Healthcare Powers of Attorney and other medical Advanced Directives. Meaning for you: Unclear; these are your taxpayer dollars going to a study to determine if your medical information should be held by the State. Those are the headliners that we found relevant to our clients and associates. We\’ll be providing deeper analyses of these issues and others as the laws become effective and part of our society\’s fabric.
Was I Just Disinherited?
As an estate planning and estate administration attorney firm, we routinely get questions when an individual’s loved one has died and they believe they are owed an inheritance. Perhaps they heard their loved one mention a Last Will and Testament or a Revocable Trust or, worse, a loved one died and because the individual is the only reviving heir, they are confused when they can’t obtain a second mortgage. Leaving the latter situation for another time, below are a few common questions we are often asked. Q: How will I know if I\’m a beneficiary of my mother’s Will or Trust?A: The Executor or Trustee must contact you; it’s the law. Q: My grandmother died a year ago and had a Trust. My uncle, the Trustee, won’t tell me anything. Is there anything I can do?A: Your grandmother may have left everything to her children (your uncle and parent) equally and not per stirpes, in which case, you may not be entitled to know anything. However, if your parent, who was your grandmother’s child, predeceased your grandmother, you could seek to probate your grandmother’s estate. Q: My father died and his Trust left everything to my stepmother, and upon her death, me and my siblings will inherit. Can’t we get anything now?A: If the terms of the trust are validly provided as you stated, you can’t receive anything now. You may receive inheritance from life insurance or bank accounts whereby your were the designated beneficiary but that’s all. A marital Trust, which is what this may be, generally provides all income and complete discretionary distributions of all principal to the surviving spouse. In other words, your stepmother can spend up or sell all trust assets, leaving you and your siblings with nothing. Be nice to your stepmom. Q: My sibling mentioned her Trust before dying a month ago and we can\’t find it among her papers. What she me and our other brother do?A: If she had a lawyer, contact the lawyer. If she was a regular client at a bank, maybe she has a safe deposit box, which will require a Small Estate Affidavit to open; but it could be in there. If you can’t find anything in 90 days, click here to learn about probate. Feel free to contact us if you\’ve got a question.
Illinois Court & AG Provides Life Preserver to Underwater Homeowners
In our probate practice, my firm occasionally provides services to individuals who inherited homes but can\’t afford the existing mortgage. Depending on the circumstances, we either assist the estate administrator in obtaining a loan modification or selling the home because a loan modification isn\’t feasible or wise. These circumstances usually arise because someone died intestate, i.e., without a will. Unfortunately, thousands of Illinois homeowners are still recovering from the sub-prime lending crisis and own homes that are “underwater,” where the balances on home mortgages exceed actual home values.Consequently, they seek loan modifications in order to prevent their homes from being foreclosed upon or to mitigate the stress on their budgets. Still, even in the wake of millions of people losing employment and homes, predatory subprime service providers haven\’t stopped. Nefarious actors can no longer offer subprime loans without impunity, so they now offer subprime loan modification services, instead. And to add insult to injury, in a recent Illinois case, wrongdoers argued that they could not be found liable for their misdeeds because they weren’t providing loans. Well, the Illinois Appellate Court in the First District disagreed. In People v. Wildermuth, the Illinois Attorney General sued lawyer and non-lawyer business partners who “aggressively” targeted African American and Latino communities to obtain clients who were faced with losing their homes. The pair falsely promised above-average loan modification results, while charging thousands of dollars for average results or worse. On behalf of Illinois citizens, the Illinois AG hauled the 2 into court on the grounds of reverse redlining, which the AG argued was a violation of the Illinois Human Rights Act. Redlining is the infamous discriminatory practice of refusing to provide mortgages in certain communities, such as minority communities. Reverse redlining is extending credit on unfair terms in “redlined” communities. The Illinois Human Rights Act protects citizens from such commercial discriminatory practices. The defendants in Wildermuth argued that because loan modifications didn’t involve new loans, i.e., they weren’t providing mortgages, that the reverse redlining theory didn’t apply to them. The Illinois Appellate Court, siding with the Illinois Attorney General, rejected their argument, stating that [R]everse redlining includes a broader scope of discriminatory practices involving real estate transactions and “target[ing] distressed African American and Latino homeowners … with regard to loan modification services and other actions including negotiation and procurement of loan modifications and short sales” was, included within that scope. So, Illinois citizens who suffer from predatory reverse redlining practices now have a remedy available when they fall victim to such practices. Lesson 1: The most basic of estate planning tools – life insurance that is sufficient to pay off the mortgage – would eliminate this issue for beneficiaries. Lesson 2: If it seems too good to be true, it usually is.
A Tale of Three Halves
Last fall, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, Second Division, ruled on an interesting case of “first impression” involving our probate courts. The case, Harris v. Adame, involved incapacity and property ownership with respect to joint tenancy, an issue that is likely to appear more often over the next few years, given our aging population. Two brothers, Arnold and Arthur, once owned a home together in joint tenancy with rights of survivorship. In 2002, Arnold was in a car accident that left him in a coma. The court appointed a guardian of the person and estate for Arnold, who later recovered but kept the guardian. A few years later, in 2005, the guardian helped sell the brothers’ home to Jose Adame. The title packet included a form stipulating that Arnold was subject to guardianship. Less than a year later, Arnold died without a will, i.e., intestate, leaving his brother, Arthur, as his sole heir. In 2008, Cook County’s Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) was appointed guardian for Arthur. Next, in 2009, the OPG filed a citation to recover assets against Adame in an attempt to void the entire 2005 home sale. At trial, Adame argued that he was an innocent bona fide purchaser (BFP). OPG argued that the entire transaction was void because Arnold was incapacitated when he signed the conveyance, despite the fact that Arthur had capacity. Adame stated that he did not have legal notice of Arnold’s incapacity before the 2005 closing. Adame further argued that if the transaction was found void, then, because he was a BFP, he should to be reimbursed for the money he paid for the home. The trial court, in 2012, ruled in favor of the OPG on the issue of whether the entire transaction was void but decided not to rule on whether Adame was a BFP and, therefore entitled to reimbursement. Huh?! I know, right? Enter a timely and appropriate appeal by Adame questioning whether the aforementioned ruling was erroneous. The appellate court, rightfully, found just that. In particular, the court found that the transaction regarding Arnold’s joint tenancy interest was void, but the sale of Arthur’s was valid and Arnold’s estate now had Adame as a tenant in common. Essentially, Arthur wasn’t due Arnold’s entire estate only Arnold’s half. The court explained the rule that without a court order, neither a person who has been adjudicated disabled nor that person’s guardian can sell the disabled person’s property interest. Here, the guardian acted without leave of court, so the transaction selling Arnold’s interest was void. As a response, OPG argued that Arthur’s part of the transaction should be considered void because at the time of the trial, Arthur was also incapacitated. The court found the OPG’s timing was off and required proof that Arthur was incapacitated at the time of executing the sale contract. OPG provided no such proof, so Arthur’s transaction was not void. Not depending on the appellate court to get the law right, Adame argued that even if the entire transaction was deemed void, the after acquired title property doctrine should apply. The after acquired title property rule provides that a transaction may be found void if a ne’er do well tried selling a property – the entire enchilada – when they don’t have marketable title. However, only half of the interest was sold to Adame, so the doctrine was inapplicable in this case. Well, if only half of the transaction is valid – or void – depending on one’s perspective, then the entire transaction must be void, OPG stated, to which the court responded with a first-year law school lesson in joint tenancy. First, the court again reminded OPG that, in law, a party needs evidence to support one’s arguments, and OPG provided no evidence, i.e., case or statutory law providing that an entire transaction is void simply because one party’s joint tenancy interest was not conveyed. On the contrary, the court provided ample support for the rule that one tenant can server joint tenancy without the other tenant’s knowledge or consent, transforming the joint tenancy into a tenancy-in-common with the new interest holder. And Arthur did just that: he created a tenancy-in-common relationship between Arnold’s estate and Adame. Now, to ensure that all parties were on the same page, the court then explained the fact that when a party severs joint tenancy, even if the action was a mistake, the agreement severing the joint tenancy is still enforceable. Thus, the appellate court found Adame owned ½ interest in the home and further instructed the trial court to determine whether, since Adame paid consideration for an entire house but only obtained ½ interest, Adame should be reimbursed for the other ½ of the consideration paid. Seems like an easy determination…
The Illinois 10-Step Probate Program
[vc_row type=\”in_container\” full_screen_row_position=\”middle\” column_margin=\”default\” column_direction=\”default\” column_direction_tablet=\”default\” column_direction_phone=\”default\” scene_position=\”center\” text_color=\”dark\” text_align=\”left\” row_border_radius=\”none\” row_border_radius_applies=\”bg\” overflow=\”visible\” overlay_strength=\”0.3\” gradient_direction=\”left_to_right\” shape_divider_position=\”bottom\” bg_image_animation=\”none\”][vc_column column_padding=\”no-extra-padding\” column_padding_tablet=\”inherit\” column_padding_phone=\”inherit\” column_padding_position=\”all\” column_element_direction_desktop=\”default\” column_element_spacing=\”default\” desktop_text_alignment=\”default\” tablet_text_alignment=\”default\” phone_text_alignment=\”default\” background_color_opacity=\”1\” background_hover_color_opacity=\”1\” column_backdrop_filter=\”none\” column_shadow=\”none\” column_border_radius=\”none\” column_link_target=\”_self\” column_position=\”default\” gradient_direction=\”left_to_right\” overlay_strength=\”0.3\” width=\”1/1\” tablet_width_inherit=\”default\” animation_type=\”default\” bg_image_animation=\”none\” border_type=\”simple\” column_border_width=\”none\” column_border_style=\”solid\”][vc_column_text text_direction=\”default\”]In Illinois, if a loved one passes away without a will or a trust in place, he or she has died “intestate.” Depending on the size and assets of the estate, probate may or may not be needed. Probate is a court proceeding where the judge appoints an “administrator” to the estate. If a will did exist and was appropriately filed, then the judge would probably appoint the will’s “executor.” The only difference between an administrator and an executor is that one is appointed intestate and the other is designated by a will. The administrator is responsible for paying all just debts and taxes, responding to claims on the estate, and concluding the final affairs of the deceased that includes distributing the assets of the estate. Sounds simple, right? Well, in today’s world, probate can be anything but simple. And unlike New Jersey, where it’s quick and cheap, in Illinois probate is long and costly. For example, the first thing one has to do is to get into court, which requires completing a petition that nominates one person as the administrator. What if Jack’s evil twin, Jill, wants to b administrator, too? Hopefully, Jill knows the slayer statute would keep her from collecting if Jack were to meet an untimely demise. The next to do is provide a list of all the heirs to the judge and prove – with birth and death certificates, and divorce decrees – where the heirship line has been broken. What if Thelma’s mom had 2 husbands and 2 children, Thelma and Louise, but Thelma could only find one set of divorce papers – the set involving the divorce from Louise’s father? And that’s all she’s going to find because Thelma’s mom and her dad were in a common law marriage in Kansas before she moved to Illinois. Let’s say the heir hurdles have been successfully jumped and you’ve been named administrator of grandma’s estate. Next we must notify any heirs and creditors, whether known or unknown, that the estate has been opened. What if Grandma forgot to mention that she borrowed $10000 from Uncle Charlie last Christmas to pay for everyone’s gifts and Uncle Charlie accepted a promissory note with the house as collateral? What if there’s no house but you find that Grandma had 12 different accounts in 12 different financial institutions totaling more than $100,000? Get the petition ready and btw – Illinois does not allow pro se appearances in probate. It is because our families are different, mobile, and complex that trusts are often recommended for individuals in Illinois. However, so we have it on record, the following are steps for opening probate in Illinois: Petition the court Notify eligible potential administrators and obtain consent or waivers from them Pay an oath and bond on the estate\’s personal property Prove heirship Appear in court and receive letters of office Notify known and unknown heirs and creditors Take an inventory of the estate assets File the inventory with surety company and heirs’ fiduciaries, e.g., guardians or conservators Respond to creditor claims Distribute assets after 6 month creditor claim period has ended The entire process from opening to closing probate can take anywhere from 9-14 months and perhaps why the steps involved in establishing a trust should be considered the \”probate-anonymous\” program. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Lottery Lessons for Murderers
Recently, an Illinois man won a million dollars playing the Illinois Lottery. In an unfortunate turn of events, shortly after taking his smiling photo op with check in hand and stating his intentions, he died. Initially, it was thought he died of bad eating habits leading to clogged arteries and a bad heart. However, something seemed a little fishy, so the authorities were called in to request an autopsy and investigate. Ya think? One need not be a lawyer to know who was first on the list of suspects: immediate family. Not only is this is going to make an interesting whodunit but it also gave yours truly the answer to “what to write about this week?” Answer: Crime doesn’t pay even if the “payor” died without a will. Let\’s look at an example: Jennifer inherits $1 million from her father and announces to family that she is going to place the money in trust for her children. Her only living relatives are her spouse, Jeremy, and their 2 sons, Bill and Ted. Jennifer then drowns while swimming but before establishing the trust and she didn’t have a will. Later, authorities arrest a close family member and charge that person with murder. It seems that the family member didn’t agree with Jennifer’s plans. So what will happen to the cool million? It depends. Usually, in Illinois, if a spouse with a child or dependent dies intestate (with no will or trust in place), then the surviving spouse and the child will share equally in the decedent’s estate…unless one of the heirs caused the decedent’s death. If the heir intentionally and unjustifiably caused the decedent’s death, then he or she will not “receive any property, benefit, or other interest by reason of the death.” Illinois Probate Act of 1975, 755 ILCS 5/2-6. Instead the benefit will go to the heir next in line. Also, the form of that benefit or interest is irrelevant; it could be retirement proceeds, which are nontestamentary. Furthermore, the denial of the inheritance need not be made in criminal court but can be made by any competent jurisdiction. However, a few hurdles still exist: The criminal proceeding must end with a final judgment of guilty … unless the criminal trial doesn’t occur for more than a year after the death. The 401(k) administrator, for example, could have released the funds to the murdering heir without knowing the heir was the one who really retired the retiree. Accordingly, the plan administrator won’t be held liable. Still, the court would likely make the defendant give the money to the heir next in line … unless, of course, the murder is a successful fugitive and not a defendant. So what would be the results for our example: If Jeremy murdered Jennifer, then the money would go to Bill and Ted as intended. If Bill was the murderer, then the money would go to Jeremy and Ted to share equally. If Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, then Jeremy gets it all. If Jeremy, Bill and Ted were co-conspirators, that would be a little odd given that Bill and Ted were going to get it all, but hey… In that case, if there were no heirs, then Illinois won the Lottery. Lesson: If you win the lottery and you have to take a photo and someone asks about your plans, tell them to contact your attorney.