Life Insurance and 90210 Accessories
Most of us know that life insurance is the most basic and essential of estate planning tools. It serves 2 fundamental purposes we face with end of life issues: (1) not leaving our loved ones with hefty funeral or memorial service bills and (2) replacing income if we were the primary wage earner or part of an even wage-earning team. So, most individuals who are employed have some type of life insurance. As discussed in a former blog post, it is further understood that life insurance can not only afford relatives a certain solace during their grieving period, but it also affords benefits before the end of life, i.e., during retirement. However, when using life insurance for its additional benefits, individuals should be careful not to overdo it or you might end up losing money instead of earning a return on your investment. Let’s visit the Petry’s, a small family of 3. Robbie is in her mid-30s and works as a middle manager for a high end office furniture sales company. Jerri is in her early 30s and works at a lucrative nail salon. Robbie and Jerri have one son, Ritchie, who is in his terrible twos. Robbie and Jerri each bought life insurance policies providing $500,000 of death benefits in the event one dies. That would provide about 7 years of replacement income. They also bought another $500,000 as retirement income, which will begin to earn value in about 10 years. Ritchie is so cute they thought he might one day be in movies, perhaps another McCaulay Culkin. So Robbie and Jerri also took out a $200,000 policy on Ritchie. Other investments include their home, which was left to Jerri by Aunt Sally, and is now paid for and valued at $200,000; and about $400,000 in other retirement planning instruments. By now you have probably identified a number of issues involving Robbie and Jerri’s insurance decisions but I’ll point out a few basic points: If your family can move to 90210 or 60043 after you’ve departed, when before they lived in an area that didn\’t consider dogs as purse accessories, that’s not a good sign. If you’re empty nesters, plan to stay that way. If the kid hasn’t been discovered by e-Trade yet, don’t put your money on it. Millions of really cute kids never make it to either screen – the big one or the little one. BUT what you need to do is talk to your team – your estate planner, your financial planner, and your CPA. Talking shouldn’t cost, initially, and this discussion should give you a good idea of how much insurance you need to purchase in the event of premature loss. You’ll also know how much will be needed to keep the nest strong, sans the birdies in the event your retirement years are lengthy. Money saver tip: Bundle your insurance like your family cell phone plans.
Pumpkinheads Afoot in Estate Planning
Wills, trusts and estate planning is a great subject for Halloween because of the trick or treat nature of the area. The treats are significant: peace of mind, retirement, healthcare, education, and family harmony. However, the tricks can quickly eliminate all or almost all of the treats for most parties involved. Because so many people know someone who has a will and have at least heard of trusts and estate planning, many people know just enough to sound knowledgeable. Yet, many individuals also lack just enough knowledge to cause schisms if their advice is actually heeded. So how can we be tricked? Let me count the ways: A living will is just as good as a healthcare power of attorney. Trick: A living will is subordinate to a healthcare power of attorney, unless the person holding the living will has a terminal illness or is in a basically vegetative state. My dad’s house is only worth $50,000, so I can file a small estate affidavit and skip probate. Trick: Sure. You can skip probate, if the house is in an Illinois land trust and let’s hope that Dad didn’t take out a second mortgage that the house is still subject to. If the house is still subject to a mortgage, you may have problems trying to sell it. Estate planning is only for the rich. Trick: I\’m not sure who invented this one…maybe the Boyz on Wall Street. Nevertheless, please read this. After 7 years of living with my man, I can finally be put into his will as his wife and our child can inherit, too. Trick: Someone has put something in your water. Illinois hasn’t recognized common law marriages for decades, and your child…the inheritance issue is an even bigger trick in this regard. A trust will keep my creditors and the repo man away from my door. Trick: Not really. The repo man is coming and a trust will generally keep creditors away only if you don\’t own anything, i.e., you are not the trustee nor are you the beneficiary of the trust assets. I won’t have to pay taxes if I put my assets in a trust. Trick or treat: If your assets are instruments that appreciate in a tax-deferred manner, then you may not have to pay estate taxes but you may have to pay income taxes. Trick: Depending on how the trust is structured and the relationships of the beneficiaries to you and each other, your beneficiaries may have to pay estate taxes. A will is less expensive than a trust. Trick or treat: If litigation is involved because of a will contest or claims are placed on the estate that need to be answered, that statement could be the costliest trick of all of the above, except maybe number 4. Money saver tip: Be patient; your debt wasn’t created in a day so unless you win the lottery, it’s not going to go away in a day either.
Money-Saving Tips with Estate Planning
This may sound counterintuitive coming from a lawyer, but my practice is purposely designed around protecting families and loving interests and saving my clients money. Yes, and I am a lawyer and said, “I want to save folks money.” So for the next few months, the focal point of my blog posts will be how you can save money through estate planning. Of course, I’ll digress occasionally, but I’ll return to the course in due time. Sometimes the discussion will be about how certain estate planning processes clients experience may be costly or inexpensive depending on the approach. Other times, the discussion will address decisions that may be costly or may save you a bundle depending on various considerations and scenarios. So let’s get started and today’s piece will cover very basic ways to save with wills or, more accurately, the lack of one or keeping the cost of probate down if the estate requires one. Money Saver Tips: In Illinois, if the estate is less than or equal to $100,000.00, probate and its accompanying court costs may not be necessary. If at any time your estate grows to more than $100,000.00, a valid will that is kept current may save your heirs thousands in having to open a significant estate where there is no will or the will is invalid. A valid will has 2 witnesses and is not handwritten. Save some money and don’t get it notarized. Wills in Illinois do not require notarization. When calculating the size of your estate for probate purposes, do not include life insurance; life insurance and retirement plans are not part of the probate estate. So if all you have is a $50,000 home and no creditors, see Money Saver Tip #1. If your estate is more than $100,000.00 and you aren’t completely sure about how to distribute your assets, don’t use a DIY program or a Big Box Store will-in-a-box. Refer to Money Saver Tip #2 for the possible consequences. Tune in next week for money-saving tips with estate planning.
Take 5: Planning for Parents with Jazz
Today, I was listening to one of my mother’s favorite tunes, “Lake Shore Drive,” by the late Art Porter, Jr. Enjoying the fact that she so loves this great sax melody reminded me of a client who recently came into my office. As we talked I was struck again by the fact that if it were not for the sacrifices made by parents, many of us would not have the good fortunes that we have today. Occasionally, individuals who understand this honour the sentiment by taking it to the next level with action. So listening today, I decided I’d pay it forward by providing 5 pieces of information you should have as you plan for your parents. The difficult conversation should, of course, have taken place. After that, you should determine the following: What the estimated amount of need-based government benefits your parents will receive by the time your plan is scheduled to start providing for you or them. This amount will determine how much you can provide for them if their assets plus their benefits is insufficient. Who are their primary physician(s), life insurance agents, and other key contact persons. If you don’t know them already, schedule time to have a small chat with each of these persons and put them on notice that your loved ones are protected not only by their services and products but also by you. Where your parents want to live in the event one or both become infirm and unable to tend to each others\’ basic needs, e.g., proper hygiene, nutritional maintenance, and medical treatments. Most folks say “my home,” unlike my mother, who sent me a link to her favourite cruise line. What their retirement and estate plans entail and if these plans reflect their current family and financial statuses. CAUTION! Sometimes parents don’t provide equally for siblings. This isn’t a smart parental move irrespective of the motivation, but it happens. So if you’re getting pushback, this may be the reason and may be a good time to try to avert a potential family feud. The nuances of how they handle finances. This may change over time but generally people are consistent in the way they manage their personal finances. For example, some folks are uncomfortable with less than $200 in their wallet; some withdraw cash from the bank at the beginning of the week that’s to last them until the next week; and some older individuals go a few times a week just because it gets them moving and, if it’s a local community branch, they get to see familiar faces. If you plan to provide for your parents and discuss these matters now, all parties will be more comfortable and less stressed-out when the time comes for you to supplement or provide them with income. Even if you aren’t sure that you’ll be able to assist your parents, this information is still valuable in case they just need your help.* Just like us, our elders generally relish their independence, so to lose some or all of that freedom can be kinda earth-shattering. If a loved one could make a possibly traumatizing situation for you less stressful, wouldn’t you want them to take the necessary steps to do so? I would. So take 5, play a little Art Porter – or The Stones – and sit down and listen, so you can pay it forward in the right key, when the time comes. As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome… *As seen in Crain\’s Chicago Business.
Team Estrogen Needs to Plan Now for Now … and Then
For my male readers, I’m shouting one out for the estrogen team, today. You\’re more than welcomed to stay and share this post with the hub of your life, but I’ll return to the neutral zone with the next post. Recently, I shared a number of articles via Twitter and LinkedIn about the supposed trepidation women have when it comes to estate planning, particularly managing their financial affairs. As a female lawyer in a practice area traditionally held by men, I must admit those articles ruffled my feathers. I contend that women are not afraid of talking about money or estate planning matters, we often just don’t think we have the time. The role of the female is still that of the family hub– mother, daughter, spouse, partner, sister. Being the family hub requires a great deal of time and effort. Add to that our occupational responsibilities and community obligations and it’s perfectly understandable why we focus on the “now” and not the “then.” Yes, we are fully aware of the fact that if we take some time now, we could make “then” better. However, as a single parent when: a presentation to a major client is due on Monday, the kids have to be taken to gymnastics and birthday parties and Sunday school, Mom needs help with her new ottoman, Sis wants a review of the web site of your annual “sisterhood vacation” hotel, as chair of the silent auction committee you have to complete the donations list by Friday night, and you still have to exercise, cook, and pick up the cleaning (housekeeper not in the budget), “converting my 401(k) into …” doesn’t really make it to the top of the list. Next, is the fact that we know we’re the hub and the emotional gravity accompanying that realization. I don’t know too many women who readily give thought to when they won’t be around to see their grandchildren, nieces’ weddings, or best friend’s daughter’s college graduation. It is a very painful and counterintuitive thought for women. Fear has little to do with it. We simply love our families and friends and cannot fathom not being there for them. Nevertheless, Ladies, as painful, counterintuitive, and time consuming as it may be, we owe it to our families and ourselves to sacrifice a manicure, to miss a committee meeting, to reschedule a conference call, to say a prayer and let Sis choose the hotel, so we can take care of “now” and “then” now. The list of reasons for doing this is not exhaustive and are compelling: Your retirement savings may be dwindling unnecessarily; Your widowed father living a few states away may have a new BFF with less than charitable thoughts about Dad’s annuity; An in-state college may not afford your son the best educational opportunity for his mechanical engineering career; You might be able to withdraw income now from grandma’s IRA (progressive grandma!); Your current income may be beneficial for a retirement vehicle that may not be as readily available when your income rises past a certain point; You may want to go on sabbatical but, who’s going to mind the store, literally; Instead of a place where Mom will be bored silly playing checkers, you may want to send her cruising 6 months a year; and You want your partner to be able to visit you immediately after major surgery. Minding our retirement and estate matters now actually makes us, the family hub, stronger. If you want, I’ll take notes at your next committee meeting, so you can meet with a reputable CFP.
DOMA Forces Same-Sex Couples to Commit Fraud
In June of this year, 2011, Illinois enacted the Civil Union Act, which provides that all the rights, benefits, and obligations of Illinois spouses are also attributed to Illinois Civil Union partners. A little more than a month later, on July 24, New York enacted the New York Marriage Equality Act, legally recognizing same-sex marriages. Other states continue this progressive and important march toward ending love discrimination while other states remain firmly entrenched in their discriminatory public policies against the LGBT community. Differences between states and discriminatory laws and policies will continue and remain in force until DOMA is repealed. So, it’s important that members of the LGBT community who are partnered in civil unions or are same-sex spouses, their loved ones, and professionals servicing them understand the implications of their status, based on DOMA. President Bill Clinton enacted DOMA (the “Defense of Marriage Act”) in the wee hours of one morning in 1996. The law stipulates that the U.S. federal government only recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman as husband and wife and “spouse” means a person of the opposite sex with respect to his or her husband or wife. Consequently, any spousal benefits derived through the federal government, and there are approximately 1,138 of them, are unavailable to civil union partners or same-sex spouses, despite state laws. Yes; Illinois provides that civil union partners are afforded all the rights, benefits, and obligations of spouses but despite that language the federal government, through DOMA, tells same-sex couples “not in my backyard.” Tax benefits are one backyard where same-sex couples experience discrimination because of DOMA. For example, the divorce settlement between heterosexual couples is tax-free. However, for same-sex couples, the payee ex-spouse or ex-partner must generally pay taxes on any divorce settlement received. More importantly, as an annual fiscal household matter, same-sex couples must file income tax forms that are fraudulent on one hand because the forms don’t reflect the true nature of the relationship, requiring individuals to state that they are “single,” when they are legally married or partnered. State income tax in Illinois is coupled with federal income tax, so even if a couple’s union is afforded the same “benefits” per Illinois law, that couple cannot take the marital tax benefit on either the state or the federal income tax form. Finally, if it’s not enough that same-sex couples are discriminated against in tax treatment with respect to income and divorce, same-sex couples also face the insult with respect to death. To illustrate: Debbie and Janet entered into a legal civil union on June 5, 2011. On July 12, Janet passed away, leaving an estate valued at one million dollars to Debbie. If Debbie were married to “John” and not a civil union partner of “Janet,” Debbie would take the estate tax free. However, Debbie was partnered with Janet and, thus, will have to pay approximately $350,000 in estate taxes. A case similar to these facts, Windsor v. United States, is why the current administration stopped defending DOMA. It is a discriminatory law promulgated by a country that is supposed to consider all people equal in the eyes of the law. How can a law that requires individuals to falsely claim who they are be constitutional?
Eyebrow Raising ILITs
I’ve mentioned before in this blog that many people who are employed are wealthier than they believe themselves to be. One reason for this is because certain assets are unused during the purchaser\’s lifetime and are subsequently overlooked when that individual creates his or her estate plan. The most popular of these instruments is life insurance. If you’ve something other than term life insurance, your life insurance policy, in addition to other benefits, if placed inside a trust may be used to even the distribution between your beneficiaries if your assets are difficult to divide. For example, let’s say you own a home valued at $300,000 and about $50,000 in cash. Let’s also say you have 2 daughters, Ivory and Jade. Ivory loves the house, lives there with you now, and wants to remain in it, whereas Jade doesn’t want to have anything to do with it. Well, if you sell the house and split the proceeds, that’s not being very nice to Ivory. On the other hand, if you give the house to Ivory and only leave the $50,000 to Jade, that’s not being very nice to Ivory. Moreover, leaving the decision to your two gems to battle out after you’ve passed away is just plain mean. This is where life insurance may be beneficial. If, using the above example, you’ve a policy that’s worth at least $250,000, you could use that to even the distribution. Of course, to keep the example simple, we’ve not accounted for real estate taxes, mortgage payments, and so forth. However, a good estate planning team should be able to assist you in dividing the assets so that everyone is relatively satisfied. Furthermore, if additional nuances are involved, a trust can also be the owner of a life insurance policy known as an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT). However, the trust must be drafted properly, taking into account how the premiums are paid, and how the beneficiaries are notified of the funding of the trust for premium payments by way of “Crummey Letters.” Other components of your estate plan must also be considered, such as retirement and public benefit plans. Still, using life insurance and a trust generally provides a number of benefits if properly implemented. The proceeds are removed from your estate, which may reduce your gift and lifetime estate taxes, the distributions to your beneficiaries are generally income tax free. Also, these types of trust may act as a credit shelter. Finally, because a trust is involved, typically probate is avoided. So if your spouse jokes around like mine does, about being worth more dead than alive, just do what I do: grin and raise an eyebrow.
With This Estate Plan, You May Take My Coat
Individuals sometimes ask me, why, if they are not millionaires, do they need an estate plan, ending with something akin to, “I’m not rich; I don’t have anything.” My response is usually the typical T&E (Trusts and Estates) mantra, “You don’t need to be ‘rich” to need an estate plan.” Furthermore, the converse is generally true – the smaller estates need equal, if not more, protection. Moreover, non-millionaire employees are “richer” than they think. Like an IRS person once said, “Stop thinking it’s your money.” So, if you\’ve been steadily employed, don’t think that the federal government sees you as a pauper, irrespective of your current financial woes. Acknowledging that these are horrendous economic times citizens worldwide, I must say that millions are also fortunate. They are employed; have retirement or profit-sharing plans; have life insurance; and they have a house, which may be worth less than what they paid for but they still own a home. My “Who Killed Kenny” winter down coat is worth less than what was paid for it but, considering January in Chicago, it would take a permanent move to my favorite desert oasis to get me to sell that coat. Pardon my slight digression, though I think you got the point: It may feel like you’re managing paycheck-to-paycheck, but even so, you may find solace in the midst of this economic maelstrom. Consider your retirement plan. It may have taken a beating over the summer, like most of our financial accounts. However, you may still be able to use your plan to your advantage in the long-term and/or to your loved ones advantage. The 2 most popular retirement accounts are 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). A 401(k) is typically a qualified plan where your employer matches your contributions. Teachers often have 403(b) accounts that operate in basically the same way as a 401(k). While 401(k) contributions are tax deductible, generally any income earned is taxed on withdrawal. Additionally, once you reach 70 ½, you must make a required minimum distribution (RMD). With a 401(k), your spouse is presumed to be the beneficiary, so if you designate other beneficiaries in your will, your spouse must waive their right to the distribution in order for the other beneficiaries to take. Also, because 401(k) plans are governed by federal law, civil union partners cannot be designated spousal beneficiaries of 401(k) plans. IRAs provide a little more flexibility than 401(k)s, because there is no RMD at any age and withdrawals from Roth IRAs are not taxed. However, the maximum contribution is significantly lower than that of a 401(k) and an IRA account may not even be available if you also have a 401(k). Still, unlike a 401(k), with an IRA, there is no presumption of a spousal beneficiary, so who you names as beneficiary, even if it is your civil union partner or same-gender spouse, is the beneficiary. If that person passes away, then the beneficiary will be the person named next or if there’s no contingent, the distribution will follow the state’s testamentary code. Equally important, you can provide for your grandchildren by creating IRAs for them, so that the distribution that would be made to your children is instead rolled over into accounts for your grandchildren. So before you think you’re “not rich,” consider your retirement plan. Basic it may be, but if properly implemented, it could provide you with comfort like my \”Who Killed Kenny\” coat on those cold, January, Chicago days.
Caring for the Truly Needy with Trusts
Parents and individuals with elderly loved ones occasionally have more than the usual health, education, maintenance, and reasonable support (aka “HEMS”) issues in terms of planning for the future. I was a babysitter for a number of years for a young girl stricken with severe cerebral palsy. Her parents were in their late 40s\’/early 50\’s. Mom stayed at home and Dad owned a small business. I always wondered what her parents would do if her father suddenly lost his small business or if something, heaven forbid, happened to him. Certain types of trusts provide a unique way of planning for scenarios just like that. They’re called “Special Needs Trusts” and are carefully drafted to ensure that the special needs of loved ones such as disabled children, parents, or the elderly are properly cared for. You may be thinking that the government provides benefits, and wondering about the value of these instruments. Well, as many disabled individuals, elderly, and their family members can tell you, government benefits are rarely sufficient en toto to cover all of the expenditures and provide a quality of life that was provided when one or both parents’ or family members’ income supplemented those benefits. So Special Needs Trusts provide a way to truly provide for those who will not be able to provide for themselves because of disability or infirmity. However, as mentioned, these trusts must be drafted carefully so as not to create a situation where your loved one suddenly becomes ineligible for government benefits because of an increased income. Certain benefit programs are need-based and income from a Special Needs Trust may result in disqualifying your loved one from the program. Again, this doesn’t happen just to the disabled, but folks receiving Medicare and certain Veteran’s benefits are also affected. So the good news is your attorney has a way, with a Special Needs Trust to help you provide for a disabled or elderly loved one. The caveat is that your attorney must be mindful of the needs-based benefit programs that can turn a good supplemental plan into a plan made of quicksand.
Thanks But No Thanks: The Benefits of Disclaiming Aunt Val\’s Gift
Occasionally, a person may receive a gift under a will or a trust that they think would be more appropriate for their descendants. In these situations – and if the trust is drafted appropriately – the person usually has a legal right to say, “Thanks, but no thanks,” to the gift. At that point, the gift then “passes” to the person’s descendant(s) or beneficiary(ies). This means that the law will consider that initial recipient dead, i.e., having “predeceased” the testator, with respect to that particular gift and, as a result, the proposed recipient’s descendants take the gift. Why would you disclaim a gift? You don’t need the gift but your descendants might. For example, if Grandpa passes away leaving his house to your father, but Dad has his own home and a retirement condo, Dad may decide that you – a young professional with student loans – may benefit from owning the home more than Dad. So, Dad says in a writing that appropriately describes the gift and is delivered to the appropriate party, “Thanks, but no thanks. I, Dad, am unequivocally and expressly refusing the house … bequeathed to me by my father …” Once Dad’s disclaimer is accepted, if you\’re the only child, then you get the house. If you have siblings, then, generally, you will need to determine with your siblings how best to divide the interest in the house. You can’t afford the responsibility. If you and your partner are urbane empty-nesters, perfectly content with your 2-bedroom city dwelling, do you want the 4-bedroom home in the suburbs that Aunt Val left you with all the maintenance and tax bills that come with it? Probably not. However, your adopted daughter who now has newborn twins and a 3-year-old could probably use the extra space. So you say in writing, “Thanks but no thanks” to Aunt Val’s lush suburban family home. You want to avoid creditors. If you refuse a gift, a creditor claim cannot attach to your interest in the gift because under the law you never had any interest in the gift once your disclaimer is accepted. However, the area of the law using disclaimers as a way to avoid creditors is rapidly closing this loophole, so creditor claim avoidance probably isn’t the most prudent use of this testamentary mechanism. Disclaimers, simple at first blush, are like most legal tools – devilish in the details. If you’re considering disclaiming a gift, below are a few points to discuss with your attorney: Whether or not the property will be completely yours if it is currently held in joint tenancy with you and 2 other tenants; The irrevocability of disclaiming; Your action to date regarding the interest in the property; and Tax implications, which should be considered sooner rather than later. In the world of wills, trusts, and estate planning, the intent of the testator is a cardinal rule. Yet, sometimes the intent of the testator and the needs of the heirs conflict. Using a disclaimer may help resolve that conflict.